TSTP Solution File: SYN355+1 by Goeland---1.0.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN355+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:23:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN355+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 02:48:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.14/0.35  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.14/0.35  [0.000038s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  Start search
% 0.14/0.35  nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.14/0.35  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~((! [X1_1] :  ((big_r(X1_1) => big_p(X1_1))) & ! [X2_2] :  ((~big_q(X2_2) => big_r(X2_2)))) => ! [X3_3] :  ((big_p(X3_3) | big_q(X3_3))))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [1] (! [X1_1] :  ((big_r(X1_1) => big_p(X1_1))) & ! [X2_2] :  ((~big_q(X2_2) => big_r(X2_2)))), ~! [X3_3] :  ((big_p(X3_3) | big_q(X3_3)))
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [1] ALPHA_AND : (! [X1_1] :  ((big_r(X1_1) => big_p(X1_1))) & ! [X2_2] :  ((~big_q(X2_2) => big_r(X2_2))))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [2] ! [X1_1] :  ((big_r(X1_1) => big_p(X1_1))), ! [X2_2] :  ((~big_q(X2_2) => big_r(X2_2)))
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [2] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X3_3] :  ((big_p(X3_3) | big_q(X3_3)))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [3] ~(big_p(skolem_X33) | big_q(skolem_X33))
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [3] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(big_p(skolem_X33) | big_q(skolem_X33))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [4] ~big_p(skolem_X33), ~big_q(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X1_1] :  ((big_r(X1_1) => big_p(X1_1)))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [5] (big_r(skolem_X33) => big_p(skolem_X33))
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [5] BETA_IMPLY : (big_r(skolem_X33) => big_p(skolem_X33))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [6] ~big_r(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [7] big_p(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [7] CLOSURE : big_p(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [6] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] :  ((~big_q(X2_2) => big_r(X2_2)))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [8] (~big_q(skolem_X33) => big_r(skolem_X33))
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [8] BETA_IMPLY : (~big_q(skolem_X33) => big_r(skolem_X33))
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [9] ~~big_q(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [10] big_r(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [9] ALPHA_NOT_NOT : ~~big_q(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  	-> [11] big_q(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [11] CLOSURE : big_q(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  [10] CLOSURE : big_r(skolem_X33)
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  [0.008207s][1][Res] 17 goroutines created
% 0.14/0.36  ==== Result ====
% 0.14/0.36  [0.008238s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------