%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN355+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:51:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.86s 2.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_p(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-arr6bdyz/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_r(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-arr6bdyz/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_q(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-arr6bdyz/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_r(X1)
    | big_q(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-arr6bdyz/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_p(esk1_0),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_r(X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_q(esk1_0),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_r(X1)
    | big_q(X1) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_r(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SYN355+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 07:43:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.86/2.33  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.86/2.33  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.86/2.33  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.86/2.33  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 7.86/2.33  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.86/2.33  #
% 7.86/2.33  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.86/2.33  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.86/2.33  
% 7.86/2.33  # Proof found!
% 7.86/2.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.86/2.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.86/2.33  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.86/2.33  
% 7.86/2.33  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.86/2.33  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 7.86/2.33  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.86/2.33  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 7.86/2.33  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 7.86/2.33  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------