TSTP Solution File: SYN354+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SYN354+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:03:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  180 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  238 (  80   ~;  82   |;  54   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (  28   !;  21   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f10]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
          & ( big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ) ) )
      & big_g(sK0,sK1)
      & big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
      ! [X2,X3] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(X1,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
        & ( big_g(X2,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
        & ( big_f(X1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
              | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
            & ( big_g(X3,X4)
              | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
        & big_g(X0,X1)
        & big_f(X0,X1) )
   => ! [X3,X2] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(sK1,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
        & ( big_g(X2,X4)
          | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
        & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
              | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
            & ( big_g(X3,X4)
              | big_g(sK1,X4) ) ) )
        & big_g(sK0,sK1)
        & big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
            | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
            | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
          & ( big_g(sK1,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X2,X4)
            | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
          & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
            | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
            | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
                | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
              & ( big_g(X3,X4)
                | big_g(sK1,X4) ) ) )
          & big_g(sK0,sK1)
          & big_f(sK0,sK1) )
     => ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
          | ~ big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) )
        & ( big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
          | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
        & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
              | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
            & ( big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
              | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ) ) )
        & big_g(sK0,sK1)
        & big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_g(X2,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X3,X4)
            | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_g(X2,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X3,X4)
            | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
      <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( big_g(X1,X4)
        <~> big_g(X3,X4) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
      <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( big_g(X1,X4)
        <~> big_g(X3,X4) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
      ? [X2,X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( big_f(X0,X1)
       => ( big_g(X0,X1)
         => ( ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
              <=> big_g(X3,X4) )
             => ( big_f(X2,X3)
               => big_f(X1,X3) ) )
           => ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
              <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
             => ( big_f(X2,X3)
                & big_f(X1,X2)
                & big_f(X0,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
    ? [X2,X3] :
    ! [X4] :
      ( big_f(X0,X1)
     => ( big_g(X0,X1)
       => ( ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
            <=> big_g(X3,X4) )
           => ( big_f(X2,X3)
             => big_f(X1,X3) ) )
         => ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
            <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
           => ( big_f(X2,X3)
              & big_f(X1,X2)
              & big_f(X0,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_20_1) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ~ big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f27,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    big_f(sK1,sK1),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1))
    | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1))
    | big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f10]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | big_f(sK1,X3)
      | big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f10]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
    | big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
    | big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1))
    | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f19]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | big_f(sK1,X3)
      | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f25,f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.15  % Problem    : SYN354+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.04/0.16  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.38  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 01:55:06 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.38  % (26034)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.21/0.39  % (26038)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [2,2]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [3,3]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [4,4]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [5,5]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [6,6]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [7,7]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [8,8]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [9,9]
% 0.21/0.40  % (26035)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26037)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26036)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26040)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26041)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [10,10]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [2,2]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.40  % (26040)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [11,11]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [4]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [3,3]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [4]
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)Memory used [KB]: 746
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (26039)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.40  % (26034)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------