TSTP Solution File: SYN353-1 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : SYN353-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 12:28:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.42s 1.82s
% Output   : Refutation 3.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (   1 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  538 (  46   ~;  60   |;   0   &; 432   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (  11 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  102 (   0   ^; 102   !;   0   ?; 102   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(f_type,type,
    f: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(z_type,type,
    z: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ( f @ B @ A @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ( f @ B @ A @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A @ C ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause11) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A @ C ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause13) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ B @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause2) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ B @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause14) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ B @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ B @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause7) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ a @ a @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause1) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ a @ a @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ B @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause4) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ B @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause15) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause6) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ ( z @ C @ A @ B ) @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ( f @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ C @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause12) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ( f @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause17) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( f @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ( f @ A @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause9) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ~ ( f @ C @ A @ B )
      | ( f @ A @ ( z @ A @ B @ C ) @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause16) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ C @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause10) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B @ C )
      | ( f @ B @ C @ A )
      | ~ ( f @ ( z @ B @ C @ A ) @ C @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[18,31,24,25,20,29,28,21,33,32,34,22,27,26,23,30,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SYN353-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.10/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May 18 19:43:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.98/0.88  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.30/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (137ms). 
% 1.30/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.75/1.23  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.75/1.23  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.75/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.01/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.01/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.01/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.01/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.01/1.37  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.42/1.81  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.42/1.81  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.42/1.82  % Time passed: 1296ms (effective reasoning time: 786ms)
% 3.42/1.82  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.42/1.82  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.42/1.82  % No. of inferences in proof: 35
% 3.42/1.82  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1296 ms resp. 786 ms w/o parsing
% 3.42/1.85  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.42/1.85  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------