%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN353-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:01:39 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7848/SYN/SYN353-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 9] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 225] [nf = 20] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1721] [nf = 88] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10805] [nf = 344] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 55860] [nf = 1423] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 232900] [nf = 5125] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 799228] [nf = 16139] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 2392112] [nf = 43039] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 21 secs [nr = 6702178] [nf = 122079] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 10236289] [nf = 168029] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 10236553] [nf = 168049] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 10238716] [nf = 168283] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 10260864] [nf = 170139] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 10532348] [nf = 193683] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 41 secs [nr = 14124142] [nf = 521758] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 175 secs [nr = 67026896] [nf = 5425953] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 127060838
% 	resolvents: 117795943	factors: 9264895
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% Total = 0
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 742849	[3] = 17215822	[4] = 47347346	[5] = 58962565	[6] = 2792256	
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] f_3		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)0	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 0
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 222429637
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 34687502
% Number of successful unifications: 127060838
% Number of unification failures: 137651464
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 315721182
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 55967270
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 29
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 0
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: nan
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 37
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 264712302
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 423536
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------