TSTP Solution File: SYN352-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN352-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:33 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 0.33s 300.14s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   2 unt;   5 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause7,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1,z(X1,X2))
    | f(X2,z(X1,X2))
    | ~ f(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.04uXolsSYo/E---3.1_29182.p',clause7) ).

cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1,X2)
    | f(z(X1,X2),z(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.04uXolsSYo/E---3.1_29182.p',clause3) ).

cnf(clause6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ f(X1,X2)
    | ~ f(X1,z(X1,X2))
    | ~ f(X2,z(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.04uXolsSYo/E---3.1_29182.p',clause6) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1,z(X1,X2))
    | f(X2,z(X1,X2))
    | ~ f(X1,X2) ),
    clause7 ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1,X2)
    | f(z(X1,X2),z(X1,X2)) ),
    clause3 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ f(X1,X2)
    | ~ f(X1,z(X1,X2))
    | ~ f(X2,z(X1,X2)) ),
    clause6 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(z(X1,X2),z(z(X1,X2),z(X1,X2)))
    | f(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    f(X1,X2),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_4]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13  % Problem    : SYN352-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:38:29 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.04uXolsSYo/E---3.1_29182.p
% 0.33/300.14  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.33/300.14  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.14  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29267 completed with status 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.33/300.14  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.14  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.33/300.14  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/300.14  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29273 completed with status 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.33/300.14  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.14  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.33/300.14  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/300.14  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.14  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.33/300.14  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.33/300.14  
% 0.33/300.14  # Proof found!
% 0.33/300.14  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.33/300.14  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/300.14  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.33/300.14  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.33/300.14  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.33/300.14  # Processed clauses                    : 21
% 0.33/300.14  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.33/300.14  # ...remaining for further processing  : 20
% 0.33/300.14  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.33/300.14  # Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.33/300.14  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.33/300.14  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.33/300.14  # Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.33/300.14  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Total rewrite steps                  : 9
% 0.33/300.14  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.33/300.14  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.33/300.14  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.33/300.14  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.33/300.14  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.33/300.14  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 0.33/300.14  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.33/300.14  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.33/300.14  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.33/300.14  # ...number of literals in the above   : 38
% 0.33/300.14  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Current number of archived clauses   : 19
% 0.33/300.14  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 57
% 0.33/300.14  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.33/300.14  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.33/300.14  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.33/300.14  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.33/300.14  # BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 0.33/300.14  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.33/300.14  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 764
% 0.33/300.14  
% 0.33/300.14  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/300.14  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.33/300.14  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.33/300.14  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.33/300.14  # Maximum resident set size: 1584 pages
% 0.33/300.14  
% 0.33/300.14  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/300.14  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.33/300.14  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.33/300.14  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.33/300.14  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.33/300.14  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.33/300.14  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------