TSTP Solution File: SYN352+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN352+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:30:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 12 ~; 19 |; 8 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 2 sgn; 8 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_18_4,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
? [X3,X4] :
! [X5] :
( big_f(X1,X2)
=> ( ( big_f(X3,X4)
=> ( big_f(X2,X5)
| big_f(X4,X5) ) )
=> ( ( ( big_f(X3,X4)
=> ( big_f(X2,X5)
<=> big_f(X3,X5) ) )
=> big_f(X5,X5) )
=> ( big_f(X3,X4)
& ( big_f(X3,X5)
<=> big_f(X4,X5) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xrs5HRB3Sf/E---3.1_9422.p',church_46_18_4) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
? [X3,X4] :
! [X5] :
( big_f(X1,X2)
=> ( ( big_f(X3,X4)
=> ( big_f(X2,X5)
| big_f(X4,X5) ) )
=> ( ( ( big_f(X3,X4)
=> ( big_f(X2,X5)
<=> big_f(X3,X5) ) )
=> big_f(X5,X5) )
=> ( big_f(X3,X4)
& ( big_f(X3,X5)
<=> big_f(X4,X5) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_18_4]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X8,X9] :
( big_f(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ( ~ big_f(X8,X9)
| big_f(esk2_0,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| big_f(X9,esk3_2(X8,X9)) )
& ( big_f(X8,X9)
| big_f(esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9)) )
& ( ~ big_f(esk2_0,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| ~ big_f(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| big_f(esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9)) )
& ( big_f(esk2_0,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| big_f(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| big_f(esk3_2(X8,X9),esk3_2(X8,X9)) )
& ( ~ big_f(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| ~ big_f(X9,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| ~ big_f(X8,X9) )
& ( big_f(X8,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| big_f(X9,esk3_2(X8,X9))
| ~ big_f(X8,X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2))
| big_f(X2,esk3_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| big_f(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(X2,esk3_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)))
| big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1,X2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_4]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN352+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:08:15 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xrs5HRB3Sf/E---3.1_9422.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # new_bool_1 with pid 9615 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 9619 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 22
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 20
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 20
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 9
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 34
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 17
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1154
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------