TSTP Solution File: SYN352+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN352+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:10:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.81s 1.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (   9   ~;   8   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (;  14   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ big_f > #nlpp > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(big_f,type,
    big_f: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
      ? [Y1,Y2] :
      ! [Z] :
        ( big_f(X1,X2)
       => ( ( big_f(Y1,Y2)
           => ( big_f(X2,Z)
              | big_f(Y2,Z) ) )
         => ( ( ( big_f(Y1,Y2)
               => ( big_f(X2,Z)
                <=> big_f(Y1,Z) ) )
             => big_f(Z,Z) )
           => ( big_f(Y1,Y2)
              & ( big_f(Y1,Z)
              <=> big_f(Y2,Z) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_18_4) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] :
      ( big_f(Y1_5,'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6))
      | big_f(Y2_6,'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6))
      | ~ big_f(Y1_5,Y2_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] :
      ( ~ big_f(Y1_5,Y1_5)
      | big_f(Y1_5,'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y1_5)) ),
    inference(factorization,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [Y2_13,Y1_14] :
      ( ~ big_f(Y2_13,'#skF_3'(Y1_14,Y2_13))
      | ~ big_f(Y1_14,'#skF_3'(Y1_14,Y2_13))
      | ~ big_f(Y1_14,Y2_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ! [Y1_15] :
      ( ~ big_f(Y1_15,'#skF_3'(Y1_15,Y1_15))
      | ~ big_f(Y1_15,Y1_15) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_40]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] : ~ big_f(Y1_5,Y1_5),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_48]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] :
      ( big_f(Y1_5,Y2_6)
      | big_f('#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6),'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_57,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] : big_f(Y1_5,Y2_6),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_14]) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_56]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SYN352+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:10:56 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.81/1.66  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.81/1.66  
% 2.81/1.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.81/1.70  
% 2.81/1.70  Inference rules
% 2.81/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.81/1.70  #Ref     : 0
% 2.81/1.70  #Sup     : 3
% 2.81/1.70  #Fact    : 2
% 2.81/1.70  #Define  : 0
% 2.81/1.70  #Split   : 0
% 2.81/1.70  #Chain   : 0
% 2.81/1.70  #Close   : 0
% 2.81/1.70  
% 2.81/1.70  Ordering : KBO
% 2.81/1.70  
% 2.81/1.70  Simplification rules
% 2.81/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.81/1.70  #Subsume      : 3
% 2.81/1.70  #Demod        : 8
% 2.81/1.70  #Tautology    : 7
% 2.81/1.70  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.81/1.70  #BackRed      : 3
% 2.81/1.70  
% 2.81/1.70  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.81/1.70  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.81/1.70  
% 2.81/1.70  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.81/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.81/1.70  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 2.81/1.70  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.81/1.70  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.81/1.70  Main loop            : 0.19
% 2.81/1.70  Inferencing          : 0.09
% 2.81/1.70  Reduction            : 0.04
% 2.81/1.70  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.81/1.70  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.81/1.70  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 2.81/1.70  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.81/1.70  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.81/1.70  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.81/1.70  Total                : 0.67
% 2.81/1.70  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.81/1.70  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.81/1.70  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.81/1.70  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------