%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN351-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:58:44 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.06s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4925/SYN/SYN351-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 25] [nf = 2] [nu = 10] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 211] [nf = 22] [nu = 54] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2656] [nf = 96] [nu = 313] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 31757] [nf = 1003] [nu = 2582] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 259613] [nf = 6814] [nu = 17723] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 1929631] [nf = 52169] [nu = 107868] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 12490268] [nf = 344600] [nu = 612546] [ut = 34]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 12490584] [nf = 344620] [nu = 612702] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 12494762] [nf = 344704] [nu = 613345] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 12534366] [nf = 345727] [nu = 617513] [ut = 40]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 33 secs [nr = 12876143] [nf = 353018] [nu = 645671] [ut = 42]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 43 secs [nr = 16367705] [nf = 446009] [nu = 863948] [ut = 42]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 157 secs [nr = 53349017] [nf = 1818839] [nu = 2873443] [ut = 42]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 104342028
% 	resolvents: 101257345	factors: 3084683
% Number of unit clauses generated: 5736483
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 5.50
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1		[1] = 14	[2] = 6		[3] = 4		
% [4] = 11	[5] = 2		[7] = 4		
% Total = 42
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 5736483	[2] = 59877275	[3] = 36263289	[4] = 2464981	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] f_4		(+)38	(-)4
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)38	(-)4
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 42
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 48930701
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 28
% Number of successful unifications: 104342028
% Number of unification failures: 590671447
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 152
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 226915780
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 51962440
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 20652182
% Max entries in substitution set: 18
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 5025475
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 41569
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 16
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 161
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 340
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.47
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 38
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 695013475
% ConstructUnitClause() = 5025516
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 7.13 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 347807
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------