TSTP Solution File: SYN350-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SYN350-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:02:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.29s
% Output : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 8 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f40,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f39,f35]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
f(a,z(z(a,a),a)),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
( f(a,z(z(a,a),a))
| f(a,z(z(a,a),a)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f28,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ f(X0,X1)
| f(X1,z(X0,X1))
| f(a,z(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).
fof(f28,plain,
f(z(a,a),a),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f21,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ f(a,z(X0,X1))
| f(z(X0,X1),a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause1) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( f(a,z(a,a))
| f(z(a,a),a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f16,f1]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X0] :
( f(X0,z(X0,X0))
| f(a,z(X0,X0)) ),
inference(factoring,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( f(X0,z(X0,X1))
| f(X1,z(X0,X1))
| f(a,z(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
fof(f39,plain,
~ f(a,z(z(a,a),a)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f28]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
( ~ f(z(a,a),a)
| ~ f(a,z(z(a,a),a)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f35,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ f(X1,z(X0,X1))
| ~ f(X0,X1)
| ~ f(a,z(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause6) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : SYN350-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 01:59:36 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.28 % (23690)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.12/0.29 % (23693)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.29 % (23696)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.29 % (23693)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.29 % (23696)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.29 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.29
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)Memory used [KB]: 747
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.29 % (23695)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.29 % (23690)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------