TSTP Solution File: SYN349+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:59:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 4 unt; 4 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| big_f('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_5) ).
cnf(2,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| ~ big_f('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_5) ).
cnf(3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| ~ big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y)
| ~ big_f(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| ~ big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_5) ).
cnf(5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y)
| ~ big_f(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_5) ).
cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| ~ big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y)
| big_f(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| ~ big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_5) ).
cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),Y)
| big_f(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y))
| big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_5) ).
cnf(11,plain,
( big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)))
| big_f('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X))) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,10,10]) ).
cnf(14,plain,
big_f(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,11]) ).
cnf(15,plain,
big_f('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,14]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
big_f('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,15,14]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,15,14]),16]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 19:51:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T19:51:48
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T19:51:48
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 #||
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 ||#
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 58 formulas have been input or derived (from 15 formulas).
% 0.20/0.51 ; 17 (29%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.51 ; 2 (12%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.51 ; 15 (88%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.51 ;
% 0.20/0.51 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Assert (1 call)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Process new row (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.004 12% Resolution (28 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (14 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (3 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (23 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (23 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (13 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (37 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.001 3% Forward simplification (31 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (17 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.002 6% Ordering (194 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.021 66% Other
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.032 Total
% 0.20/0.51 ; 0.034 Real time
% 0.20/0.51 ;
% 0.20/0.51 ; Term-hash-array has 15 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 11 entries (13 at peak, 13 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 33 nodes (38 at peak, 38 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 38 possibly forward subsuming rows in 23 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 8 possibly backward subsumed rows in 13 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Path-index has 15 entries (15 at peak, 17 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Path-index has 33 nodes (33 at peak, 34 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Trie-index has 15 entries (15 at peak, 17 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Trie-index has 32 nodes (32 at peak, 38 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 8 generalization terms in 12 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 4 instance terms in 3 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ; Retrieved 504 unifiable terms in 147 calls.
% 0.20/0.51 ;
% 0.20/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 1 with value 23 1 with value 33
% 0.20/0.51 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.20/0.51 ; 1 with value (4 14)
% 0.20/0.51 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.51 0.034 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.51 0.028928 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.51 0.005352 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.51 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.51 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.51 2,619,904 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.51 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T19:51:48
% 0.20/0.51 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.51 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------