TSTP Solution File: SYN348-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN348-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:30:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause6)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2)) ),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2)) ),
clause13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2)) ),
clause7,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2)) ),
clause3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause8,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2)) ),
clause11,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1) ),
clause9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1) ),
clause15,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1)) ),
clause16,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,w(X1)),w(X1))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,w(X1)))
| f(g(X1,w(X1)),X1)
| f(X1,g(X1,w(X1))) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN348-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:55:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S42oqZ1InA/E---3.1_12900.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 12979 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 12985 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # No proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 16
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 34
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2123
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------