TSTP Solution File: SYN347-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN347-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:20:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (   9 unt;   6 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ f(u,y__dfg(v,u))
    | f(v,y__dfg(v,u))
    | f(a,b) ),
    file('SYN347-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ f(u,y__dfg(u,v))
    | f(v,y__dfg(u,v))
    | f(a,b) ),
    file('SYN347-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ f(u,y__dfg(v,u))
    | ~ f(v,y__dfg(v,u))
    | ~ f(a,b) ),
    file('SYN347-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ f(a,b)
    | f(u,y__dfg(v,u))
    | f(v,y__dfg(v,u)) ),
    file('SYN347-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( f(b,y__dfg(u,v))
    | f(a,y__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN347-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ f(b,y__dfg(u,v))
    | ~ f(a,y__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN347-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    f(a,b),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[2]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:2.2')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( f(u,y__dfg(v,u))
    | f(v,y__dfg(v,u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[4,7]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:4.0,7.0')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,y__dfg(v,u))
    | ~ f(v,y__dfg(v,u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[3,7]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:3.2,7.0')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    f(u,y__dfg(u,u)),
    inference(fac,[status(thm)],[8]),
    [iquote('1:Fac:8.0,8.1')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ~ f(u,y__dfg(u,u)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,9]),
    [iquote('1:Res:10.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[17,10]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:17.0,10.0')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ~ f(a,b),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[18,7]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:18.0,2.2,7.0')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,y__dfg(u,v))
    | f(v,y__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[2]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:18.0,2.0,2.1')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,y__dfg(v,u))
    | f(v,y__dfg(v,u)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1,19]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:1.2,19.0')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( f(b,y__dfg(a,u))
    | f(u,y__dfg(a,u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,20]),
    [iquote('1:Res:5.1,20.0')] ).

cnf(23,plain,
    f(b,y__dfg(a,b)),
    inference(fac,[status(thm)],[22]),
    [iquote('1:Fac:22.0,22.1')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    f(a,y__dfg(a,b)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[23,21]),
    [iquote('1:Res:23.0,21.0')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ~ f(b,y__dfg(a,b)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[28,6]),
    [iquote('1:Res:28.0,6.1')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[33,23]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:33.0,23.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SYN347-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:48:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.40  
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.40  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS derived 24 clauses, backtracked 5 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 24 clauses.
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS allocated 63101 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.40  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.40  
% 0.18/0.40  
% 0.18/0.40  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 20 :
% 0.18/0.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.40  Formulae used in the proof : clause1 clause2 clause3 clause4 clause5 clause6
% 0.18/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------