TSTP Solution File: SYN347+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN347+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:12:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s 1.10s
% Output   : Refutation 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SYN347+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:11:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36  Mon Jul 11 21:11:28 2022
% 0.14/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25416.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.14/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 0.14/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 8
% 0.14/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 0.14/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 4
% 0.14/0.39     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.39     distinct function count: 1
% 0.14/0.39     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  
% 0.14/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.92/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Model 2 [ 1 1 349 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Model 3 [ 1 12 183005 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Model 4 [ 3 0 769 ] (0.00 seconds, 156470 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.71 sec ----> 34 [hyper,32,7,25] {-} $F.
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.92/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  1 [] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,B))|big_f(B,$f1(A,B))|big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  2 [] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,B))| -big_f(B,$f1(A,B))|big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  3 [] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,B))|big_f(B,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  4 [] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,B))| -big_f(B,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  5 [] {+} -big_f($c2,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($c1,$f1(A,B)).
% 0.92/1.10  6 [factor,3.1.2] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,A))| -big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  7 [factor,4.1.2] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,A))| -big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  8 [] {-} big_f($c2,$f1(A,B))|big_f($c1,$f1(A,B)).
% 0.92/1.10  10 [hyper,8,1] {-} big_f($c1,$f1($c2,A))|big_f(A,$f1($c2,A))|big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  11 [hyper,8,2] {-} big_f($c2,$f1(A,$c1))|big_f(A,$f1(A,$c1))|big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  14 [factor,10.1.2] {-} big_f($c1,$f1($c2,$c1))|big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  15 [factor,11.1.2] {-} big_f($c2,$f1($c2,$c1))|big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  25 [hyper,15,5,14,factor_simp] {-} big_f($c2,$c1).
% 0.92/1.10  32 [hyper,25,6] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,A)).
% 0.92/1.10  34 [hyper,32,7,25] {-} $F.
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.92/1.10  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  ============ end of search ============
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 0.92/1.10  false clauses given          8
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.92/1.10    10  1         0
% 0.92/1.10  tot:  1         0      (0.0% true)
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Model 4 [ 3 0 769 ] (0.00 seconds, 156470 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.92/1.10  
% 0.92/1.10  Process 25416 finished Mon Jul 11 21:11:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------