TSTP Solution File: SYN346+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SYN346+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:34:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.53s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.20 % Problem : SYN346+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.02/0.21 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.08/0.43 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.43 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.43 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.43 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:33:56 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.53 Command-line arguments: --flip-ordering --lhs-weight 1 --depth-weight 60 --distributivity-heuristic
% 0.13/0.53
% 0.13/0.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.55 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.13/0.55 fof(church_46_17_2, conjecture, ![X1, X2]: ?[Y1, Y2]: ![Z1, Z2]: (big_f(X2, Z1) => (big_f(Y1, Z2) => ((big_f(Y1, Z1) & big_f(Y2, Z1)) | (big_f(X2, Z2) & big_f(Y2, Z2)))))).
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.13/0.55 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.13/0.55 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.13/0.55 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.13/0.55 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.13/0.55 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.13/0.55 variables of u and v.
% 0.13/0.55 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.13/0.55 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 Axiom 1 (church_46_17_2_1): big_f(x2, z1(X, Y)) = true2.
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 Goal 1 (church_46_17_2_2): tuple(big_f(X, z1(X, Y)), big_f(Y, z1(X, Y))) = tuple(true2, true2).
% 0.13/0.55 The goal is true when:
% 0.13/0.55 X = x2
% 0.13/0.55 Y = x2
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 Proof:
% 0.13/0.55 tuple(big_f(x2, z1(x2, x2)), big_f(x2, z1(x2, x2)))
% 0.13/0.55 = { by axiom 1 (church_46_17_2_1) }
% 0.13/0.55 tuple(true2, big_f(x2, z1(x2, x2)))
% 0.13/0.55 = { by axiom 1 (church_46_17_2_1) }
% 0.13/0.55 tuple(true2, true2)
% 0.13/0.55 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.55
% 0.13/0.55 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------