TSTP Solution File: SYN345-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN345-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:18:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SYN345-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 19:54:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.41/0.97 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.41/0.97 Process 32656 was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.41/0.97 Mon Jul 11 19:54:55 2022
% 0.41/0.97 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_32503_n023.cluster.edu".
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_32503_n023.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.41/0.97 set(auto2).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.41/0.97 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.41/0.97 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.41/0.97 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.97 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.41/0.97 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.41/0.97 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.41/0.97 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.41/0.97 clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (8 formulas)
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.41/0.97 Function symbol KB weights: b=1. a=1. z=1.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.41/0.97 % Length of proof is 19.
% 0.41/0.97 % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.41/0.97 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.41/0.97 % Given clauses 14.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 1 f(A,B,z(A,B)) | f(a,a,b) | f(a,b,b) # label(clause5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 2 -f(b,b,A) | -f(a,a,b) | -f(a,b,b) # label(clause8) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 3 f(a,b,A) | -f(a,a,b) | f(a,b,b) # label(clause1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 4 f(b,A,B) | f(a,a,b) | -f(a,b,b) # label(clause3) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 5 -f(b,b,A) | f(a,a,b) | f(a,b,b) # label(clause7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 7 f(A,B,z(A,B)) | -f(a,a,b) | -f(a,b,b) # label(clause6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 8 -f(A,z(A,B),z(A,B)) | f(a,a,b) | -f(a,b,b) # label(clause4) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.97 9 f(a,b,b) | -f(a,a,b). [factor(3,a,c)].
% 0.41/0.97 10 f(a,a,b) | f(a,b,b). [resolve(5,a,1,a),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.41/0.97 11 f(a,b,b). [resolve(10,a,9,b),merge(b)].
% 0.41/0.97 12 -f(A,z(A,B),z(A,B)) | f(a,a,b). [back_unit_del(8),unit_del(c,11)].
% 0.41/0.97 13 f(A,B,z(A,B)) | -f(a,a,b). [back_unit_del(7),unit_del(c,11)].
% 0.41/0.97 14 f(b,A,B) | f(a,a,b). [back_unit_del(4),unit_del(c,11)].
% 0.41/0.97 15 -f(b,b,A) | -f(a,a,b). [back_unit_del(2),unit_del(c,11)].
% 0.41/0.97 17 f(A,B,z(A,B)) | f(b,C,D). [resolve(13,b,14,b)].
% 0.41/0.97 18 f(b,A,z(b,A)). [factor(17,a,b)].
% 0.41/0.97 19 f(a,a,b). [resolve(12,a,14,a),merge(b)].
% 0.41/0.97 20 -f(b,b,A). [back_unit_del(15),unit_del(b,19)].
% 0.41/0.97 21 $F. [resolve(20,a,18,a)].
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Given=14. Generated=25. Kept=20. proofs=1.
% 0.41/0.97 Usable=3. Sos=2. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=21. Hints=0.
% 0.41/0.97 Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.41/0.97 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.41/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.41/0.97
% 0.41/0.97 Process 32656 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 19:54:55 2022
% 0.41/0.97 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------