TSTP Solution File: SYN345+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN345+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:20:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN345+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:40:13 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.45 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS derived 6 clauses, backtracked 10 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 17 clauses.
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS allocated 85069 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 22 :
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.45 1[0:Inp] || -> big_f(u,v,skf1(v,u))*.
% 0.20/0.45 2[0:Inp] || big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)* -> big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3).
% 0.20/0.45 3[0:Inp] || big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3) -> big_f(skc3,u,v)* big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.20/0.45 4[0:Inp] || big_f(skc3,skc3,u)* -> big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)* big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3).
% 0.20/0.45 5[0:Inp] || big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)* big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3) big_f(skc3,skc3,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 6[0:Inp] || big_f(u,skf1(v,u),skf1(v,u))* big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3) -> big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3).
% 0.20/0.45 7[0:MRR:4.1,2.0] || big_f(skc3,skc3,u)*+ -> big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.20/0.45 8[0:MRR:5.1,7.1] || big_f(skc3,skc3,u)* big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 9[1:Spt:2.0] || big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 10[1:MRR:3.2,9.0] || big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3)* -> big_f(skc3,u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.45 11[1:MRR:6.2,9.0] || big_f(u,skf1(v,u),skf1(v,u))* big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3) -> .
% 0.20/0.45 12[2:Spt:7.1] || -> big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.20/0.45 13[2:MRR:10.0,12.0] || -> big_f(skc3,u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.45 14[2:MRR:11.1,12.0] || big_f(u,skf1(v,u),skf1(v,u))* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 15[2:UnC:14.0,13.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.45 16[2:Spt:15.0,7.1,12.0] || big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 17[2:Spt:15.0,7.0] || big_f(skc3,skc3,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 18[2:UnC:17.0,1.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.45 19[1:Spt:18.0,2.0,9.0] || -> big_f(skc2,skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.20/0.45 20[1:Spt:18.0,2.1] || -> big_f(skc2,skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.20/0.45 21[1:MRR:8.1,19.0] || big_f(skc3,skc3,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 22[1:UnC:21.0,1.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.45 Formulae used in the proof : church_46_16_4
% 0.20/0.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------