TSTP Solution File: SYN345+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN345+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:10:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.75s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  17 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  20   ~;  14   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   2   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (;  25   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ big_f > #nlpp > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(big_f,type,
    big_f: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
      ? [Y1,Y2] :
      ! [Z] :
        ( ( ( big_f(X1,X2,Y1)
           => big_f(Y2,Y1,Z) )
         => ( big_f(X1,X1,X2)
           => big_f(X1,X2,X2) ) )
       => ( ( ( big_f(X2,Y1,Y2)
             => big_f(Y1,Z,Z) )
           => ( big_f(X1,X2,X2)
             => big_f(X1,X1,X2) ) )
         => ( big_f(Y1,Y2,Z)
           => ( big_f(X2,X2,Y1)
              & ( big_f(X1,X1,X2)
              <=> big_f(X1,X2,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_16_4) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] : big_f(Y1_5,Y2_6,'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] :
      ( big_f('#skF_2',Y1_5,Y2_6)
      | big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_14]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] :
      ( big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2',Y1_5)
      | big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_21,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] :
      ( big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2',Y1_5)
      | ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2') ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_18]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_21]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] :
      ( big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2')
      | big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_2','#skF_2',Y1_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [Y1_10] : ~ big_f('#skF_2','#skF_2',Y1_10),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_22,c_10]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_24]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] : big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2',Y1_5),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_21]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_20]) ).

tff(c_35,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] :
      ( big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2')
      | big_f('#skF_2',Y1_5,Y2_6) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_14]) ).

tff(c_37,plain,
    big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_35]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_14]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] :
      ( ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_2','#skF_2',Y1_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    ! [Y1_5] :
      ( ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_2','#skF_2',Y1_5) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_4]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_39]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_37,c_40]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [Y1_11] : ~ big_f('#skF_2','#skF_2',Y1_11),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_39]) ).

tff(c_51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_46]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] : big_f('#skF_2',Y1_5,Y2_6),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_35]) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_35]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] :
      ( ~ big_f(Y1_5,'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6),'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6))
      | big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2')
      | ~ big_f('#skF_1','#skF_2','#skF_2') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_63,plain,
    ! [Y1_5,Y2_6] :
      ( ~ big_f(Y1_5,'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6),'#skF_3'(Y1_5,Y2_6))
      | big_f('#skF_1','#skF_1','#skF_2') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_12]) ).

tff(c_65,plain,
    ! [Y1_14,Y2_15] : ~ big_f(Y1_14,'#skF_3'(Y1_14,Y2_15),'#skF_3'(Y1_14,Y2_15)),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_63]) ).

tff(c_70,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_65]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SYN345+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:24:20 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.75/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.71  
% 2.75/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.75/1.75  
% 2.75/1.75  Inference rules
% 2.75/1.75  ----------------------
% 2.75/1.75  #Ref     : 0
% 2.75/1.75  #Sup     : 3
% 2.75/1.75  #Fact    : 0
% 2.75/1.75  #Define  : 0
% 2.75/1.75  #Split   : 4
% 2.75/1.75  #Chain   : 0
% 2.75/1.75  #Close   : 0
% 2.75/1.75  
% 2.75/1.75  Ordering : KBO
% 2.75/1.75  
% 2.75/1.75  Simplification rules
% 2.75/1.75  ----------------------
% 2.75/1.75  #Subsume      : 3
% 2.75/1.75  #Demod        : 11
% 2.75/1.75  #Tautology    : 4
% 2.75/1.75  #SimpNegUnit  : 4
% 2.75/1.75  #BackRed      : 1
% 2.75/1.75  
% 2.75/1.75  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.75/1.75  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.75/1.75  
% 2.75/1.75  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.75/1.75  ----------------------
% 2.75/1.75  Preprocessing        : 0.42
% 2.75/1.75  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.75/1.75  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.75/1.75  Main loop            : 0.16
% 2.75/1.75  Inferencing          : 0.05
% 2.75/1.75  Reduction            : 0.04
% 2.75/1.75  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.75/1.75  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.75/1.75  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 2.75/1.75  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.75/1.75  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.75/1.75  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.75/1.75  Total                : 0.64
% 2.75/1.75  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.75/1.75  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.75/1.75  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.75/1.75  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------