TSTP Solution File: SYN342+1 by Nitpick---2016

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SYN342+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:46:56 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 24.24s
% Output   : FiniteModel 24.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN342+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 01:22:18 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime: 
% 24.24/20.18  Nitpicking formula...
% 24.24/20.18  Timestamp: 01:22:27
% 24.24/20.18  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 24.24/20.18  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 24.24/20.18  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 24.24/20.18    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 24.24/20.18    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 24.24/20.18    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 24.24/20.18    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 24.24/20.18    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 24.24/20.18  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 24.24/20.18  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 24.24/20.18  
% 24.24/20.18    Skolem constants:
% 24.24/20.18      X1 = i1
% 24.24/20.18      \<lambda>X2. X3 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i2, i2 := i1)
% 24.24/20.18    Constant:
% 24.24/20.18      bnd_big_f =
% 24.24/20.18        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.24/20.18        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.24/20.18           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True),
% 24.24/20.18            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)),
% 24.24/20.18         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.24/20.18           (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False),
% 24.24/20.18            i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)))
% 24.24/20.18  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 24.24/20.18  Total time: 6.7 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------