TSTP Solution File: SYN341-1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN341-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:54:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN341-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 03:04:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.12/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.40  tff(f_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40     f: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(y4_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40     y4: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(y2_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40     y2: $i > $i)).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(elem_0_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.40     elem_0: $i)).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(1,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (^[Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : refl((~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3))) <=> (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3))))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(2,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3))) <=> ![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(3,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3))) <=> ![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(4,axiom,(![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','clause2')).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(5,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 3])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(6,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40      ![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[5])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(7,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 2])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(8,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      ((~![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : (~f(y2(Y1), Y3, y4(Y1, Y3)))) | (~f(y2(elem!0), y2(y2(elem!0)), y4(elem!0, y2(y2(elem!0)))))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(9,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (~f(y2(elem!0), y2(y2(elem!0)), y4(elem!0, y2(y2(elem!0))))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[8, 7])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(10,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (^[Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : refl(f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3) <=> f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(11,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3) <=> ![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[10])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(12,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3) <=> ![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(13,axiom,(![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','clause1')).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(14,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 12])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(15,plain,(
% 0.12/0.40      ![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[14])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(16,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      (![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 11])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(17,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      ((~![Y1: $i, Y3: $i] : f(Y1, y2(Y1), Y3)) | f(y2(elem!0), y2(y2(elem!0)), y4(elem!0, y2(y2(elem!0))))),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.40  tff(18,plain,
% 0.12/0.40      ($false),
% 0.12/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[17, 16, 9])).
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------