TSTP Solution File: SYN341+1 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SYN341+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 02:49:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.84s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : SYN341+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.06/0.26 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:47:54 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.84 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.42/0.84 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.42/0.84 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.42/0.84 Bliksem 1.12
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Clauses:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 { big_f( X, skol1( X ), Y ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 { ! big_f( skol1( X ), Y, skol2( X, Y ) ) }.
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.42/0.84 This is a near-Horn, non-equality problem
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Options Used:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 useres = 1
% 0.42/0.84 useparamod = 0
% 0.42/0.84 useeqrefl = 0
% 0.42/0.84 useeqfact = 0
% 0.42/0.84 usefactor = 1
% 0.42/0.84 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 0.42/0.84 usesimpdemod = 0
% 0.42/0.84 usesimpres = 4
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 resimpinuse = 1000
% 0.42/0.84 resimpclauses = 20000
% 0.42/0.84 substype = standard
% 0.42/0.84 backwardsubs = 1
% 0.42/0.84 selectoldest = 5
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 litorderings [0] = split
% 0.42/0.84 litorderings [1] = liftord
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 termordering = none
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 litapriori = 1
% 0.42/0.84 termapriori = 0
% 0.42/0.84 litaposteriori = 0
% 0.42/0.84 termaposteriori = 0
% 0.42/0.84 demodaposteriori = 0
% 0.42/0.84 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 litselect = negative
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 maxweight = 30000
% 0.42/0.84 maxdepth = 30000
% 0.42/0.84 maxlength = 115
% 0.42/0.84 maxnrvars = 195
% 0.42/0.84 excuselevel = 0
% 0.42/0.84 increasemaxweight = 0
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 maxselected = 10000000
% 0.42/0.84 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 showgenerated = 0
% 0.42/0.84 showkept = 0
% 0.42/0.84 showselected = 0
% 0.42/0.84 showdeleted = 0
% 0.42/0.84 showresimp = 1
% 0.42/0.84 showstatus = 2000
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 prologoutput = 0
% 0.42/0.84 nrgoals = 5000000
% 0.42/0.84 totalproof = 1
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 ! [4, 1] (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 big_f [39, 3] (w:1, o:41, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 skol1 [40, 1] (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/0.84 skol2 [41, 2] (w:1, o:40, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Starting Search:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.42/0.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 (0) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V2,M1} I { big_f( X, skol1( X ), Y ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 (1) {G0,W8,D3,L1,V2,M1} I { ! big_f( skol1( X ), Y, skol2( X, Y ) ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 (2) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(1,0) { }.
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.84 found a proof!
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 (4) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V2,M1} { big_f( X, skol1( X ), Y ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 (5) {G0,W8,D3,L1,V2,M1} { ! big_f( skol1( X ), Y, skol2( X, Y ) ) }.
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Total Proof:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 subsumption: (0) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V2,M1} I { big_f( X, skol1( X ), Y ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 parent0: (4) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V2,M1} { big_f( X, skol1( X ), Y ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 substitution0:
% 0.42/0.84 X := X
% 0.42/0.84 Y := Y
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84 permutation0:
% 0.42/0.84 0 ==> 0
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 subsumption: (1) {G0,W8,D3,L1,V2,M1} I { ! big_f( skol1( X ), Y, skol2( X,
% 0.42/0.84 Y ) ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 parent0: (5) {G0,W8,D3,L1,V2,M1} { ! big_f( skol1( X ), Y, skol2( X, Y ) )
% 0.42/0.84 }.
% 0.42/0.84 substitution0:
% 0.42/0.84 X := X
% 0.42/0.84 Y := Y
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84 permutation0:
% 0.42/0.84 0 ==> 0
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 resolution: (6) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} { }.
% 0.42/0.84 parent0[0]: (1) {G0,W8,D3,L1,V2,M1} I { ! big_f( skol1( X ), Y, skol2( X, Y
% 0.42/0.84 ) ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 parent1[0]: (0) {G0,W5,D3,L1,V2,M1} I { big_f( X, skol1( X ), Y ) }.
% 0.42/0.84 substitution0:
% 0.42/0.84 X := X
% 0.42/0.84 Y := skol1( skol1( X ) )
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84 substitution1:
% 0.42/0.84 X := skol1( X )
% 0.42/0.84 Y := skol2( X, skol1( skol1( X ) ) )
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 subsumption: (2) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(1,0) { }.
% 0.42/0.84 parent0: (6) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} { }.
% 0.42/0.84 substitution0:
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84 permutation0:
% 0.42/0.84 end
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Proof check complete!
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Memory use:
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 space for terms: 49
% 0.42/0.84 space for clauses: 192
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 clauses generated: 3
% 0.42/0.84 clauses kept: 3
% 0.42/0.84 clauses selected: 2
% 0.42/0.84 clauses deleted: 0
% 0.42/0.84 clauses inuse deleted: 0
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 subsentry: 0
% 0.42/0.84 literals s-matched: 0
% 0.42/0.84 literals matched: 0
% 0.42/0.84 full subsumption: 0
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 checksum: -205523172
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84
% 0.42/0.84 Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------