TSTP Solution File: SYN339-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN339-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:10:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.15s 1.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (;   8   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ f > #nlpp > y

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(f,type,
    f: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(y,type,
    y: $i > $i ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ! [X,Z] : f(X,y(X),Z),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_31,axiom,
    ! [X,Z] : ~ f(y(X),Z,Z),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X_7,Z_8] : f(X_7,y(X_7),Z_8),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_3,Z_4] : ~ f(y(X_3),Z_4,Z_4),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).

tff(c_11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN339-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:30:36 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.15/1.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.37/1.54  
% 2.37/1.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.37/1.57  
% 2.37/1.57  Inference rules
% 2.37/1.57  ----------------------
% 2.37/1.57  #Ref     : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Sup     : 1
% 2.37/1.57  #Fact    : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Define  : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Split   : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Chain   : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Close   : 0
% 2.37/1.57  
% 2.37/1.57  Ordering : KBO
% 2.37/1.57  
% 2.37/1.57  Simplification rules
% 2.37/1.57  ----------------------
% 2.37/1.57  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Demod        : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.37/1.57  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.37/1.57  
% 2.37/1.57  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.37/1.57  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.37/1.57  
% 2.37/1.57  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.37/1.57  ----------------------
% 2.37/1.58  Preprocessing        : 0.36
% 2.37/1.58  Parsing              : 0.20
% 2.37/1.58  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.37/1.58  Main loop            : 0.09
% 2.37/1.58  Inferencing          : 0.04
% 2.37/1.58  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.37/1.58  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.37/1.58  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.37/1.58  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.37/1.58  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.37/1.58  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.37/1.58  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.37/1.58  Total                : 0.51
% 2.37/1.58  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.37/1.58  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.37/1.58  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.37/1.58  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------