TSTP Solution File: SYN339+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN339+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:51:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.36s 2.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(esk1_1(X1),X2,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-15_4t7pw/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1,esk1_1(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-15_4t7pw/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(esk1_1(X1),X2,X2),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1,esk1_1(X1),X2),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SYN339+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:23:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.36/2.06  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.36/2.06  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.36/2.06  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.36/2.06  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S043I
% 4.36/2.06  # and selection function PSelectMaxLComplexNoTypePred.
% 4.36/2.06  #
% 4.36/2.06  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 4.36/2.06  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.36/2.06  
% 4.36/2.06  # Proof found!
% 4.36/2.06  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.36/2.06  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.36/2.06  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.36/2.06  
% 4.36/2.06  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.36/2.06  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 4.36/2.06  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 4.36/2.06  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 4.36/2.06  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.36/2.06  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------