TSTP Solution File: SYN337-10 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SYN337-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named goal)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    a2 != b2,
    goal,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(f(b,X1),true,a2,b2) = b2,
    clause4,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    f(z(X1),X1) = true,
    clause3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    f(z(X1),a) = true,
    clause2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,X1) = true,
    clause1,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SYN337-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:45:42 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ciwC6xxHHE/E---3.1_25551.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # new_bool_3 with pid 25636 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with pid 25655 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.19/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 7
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6
% 0.19/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.19/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 7
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 101
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.19/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------