TSTP Solution File: SYN336+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SYN336+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:06:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.69s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  10   ~;   0   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   2 sgn;  19   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1,X2] :
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_f(X0,X3)
     => ( big_f(X1,X3)
       => ( big_f(X2,X3)
         => ( big_f(X1,X0)
           => big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_15_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
      ? [X1,X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( big_f(X0,X3)
       => ( big_f(X1,X3)
         => ( big_f(X2,X3)
           => ( big_f(X1,X0)
             => big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X3,X2)
      & big_f(X1,X0)
      & big_f(X2,X3)
      & big_f(X1,X3)
      & big_f(X0,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X3,X2)
      & big_f(X1,X0)
      & big_f(X2,X3)
      & big_f(X1,X3)
      & big_f(X0,X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1,X2] :
      ? [X3] :
        ( ~ big_f(X3,X2)
        & big_f(X1,X0)
        & big_f(X2,X3)
        & big_f(X1,X3)
        & big_f(X0,X3) )
   => ! [X2,X1] :
      ? [X3] :
        ( ~ big_f(X3,X2)
        & big_f(X1,sK0)
        & big_f(X2,X3)
        & big_f(X1,X3)
        & big_f(sK0,X3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ~ big_f(X3,X2)
          & big_f(X1,sK0)
          & big_f(X2,X3)
          & big_f(X1,X3)
          & big_f(sK0,X3) )
     => ( ~ big_f(sK1(X1,X2),X2)
        & big_f(X1,sK0)
        & big_f(X2,sK1(X1,X2))
        & big_f(X1,sK1(X1,X2))
        & big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1(X1,X2),X2)
      & big_f(X1,sK0)
      & big_f(X2,sK1(X1,X2))
      & big_f(X1,sK1(X1,X2))
      & big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f4,f6,f5]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X1] : big_f(X1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] : ~ big_f(sK1(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(sK1(X0,X1),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X0,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_50]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN336+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:28:07 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.69/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.69/1.18  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.69/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.69/1.18  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  ------ Parsing...
% 0.69/1.18  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s 
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.69/1.18  
% 0.69/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------