TSTP Solution File: SYN335-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN335-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:56:40 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31398/SYN/SYN335-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31] [nf = 0] [nu = 8] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 258] [nf = 0] [nu = 32] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1986] [nf = 23] [nu = 136] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15648] [nf = 273] [nu = 735] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 117335] [nf = 1910] [nu = 3757] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 842784] [nf = 17392] [nu = 21489] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 5851007] [nf = 110270] [nu = 118414] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 11937350] [nf = 239378] [nu = 235889] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 11937577] [nf = 239378] [nu = 235913] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 11939312] [nf = 239401] [nu = 236017] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 11954653] [nf = 239725] [nu = 236705] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 12083053] [nf = 242306] [nu = 240316] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 35 secs [nr = 13199992] [nf = 275972] [nu = 262707] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 63 secs [nr = 23375441] [nf = 649219] [nu = 400948] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 112459039
% resolvents: 108316969 factors: 4142070
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1285911
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 1.14
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [1] = 2 [2] = 1 [4] = 1
% Total = 5
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1285911 [2] = 31730707 [3] = 53892770 [4] = 23423992 [5] = 2125659
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] f_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [1] g_2 (+)3 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)4 (-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 5
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 114924983
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 7685674
% Number of successful unifications: 112459039
% Number of unification failures: 116238915
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 204663669
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 216340922
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1089658
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 358408
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 10
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 3
% Number of states in UCFA table: 32
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 32
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.00
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 37
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 228697954
% ConstructUnitClause() = 1089662
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 1.50 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 374863
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------