TSTP Solution File: SYN334-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN334-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:20:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   2 unt;   8 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | ~ g(v,z__dfg(u,v))
    | f(u,z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | ~ f(u,z__dfg(u,v))
    | g(v,z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | ~ f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))
    | g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( f(u,v)
    | f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))
    | f(u,v) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( g(u,v)
    | g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ g(u,v)
    | ~ g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    file('SYN334-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( g(u,v)
    | f(u,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,5]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.1,5.0')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[3,8]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:3.1,8.1')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | ~ g(u,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:9.1,7.1')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | ~ f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:9.1,13.1')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( ~ f(u,v)
    | f(v,z__dfg(u,v))
    | f(u,z__dfg(u,v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:8.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    ( f(u,v)
    | f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)))
    | f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,22]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.1,22.0')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( f(u,v)
    | f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[24]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:24.1')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    ( ~ f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))
    | f(u,v)
    | g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[25,2]),
    [iquote('0:Res:25.1,2.1')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( f(u,v)
    | g(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v))) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[28,4]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:28.0,4.1')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( ~ f(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(z__dfg(u,v),z__dfg(u,v)))
    | f(u,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:29.1,13.1')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    f(u,v),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[33,25]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:33.0,25.1')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[16,35]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:16.1,16.0,35.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SYN334-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:28:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS derived 30 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 23 clauses.
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS allocated 63103 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 19 :
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : clause1 clause2 clause3 clause4 clause5 clause6 clause7
% 0.20/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------