TSTP Solution File: SYN332-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN332-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:24:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.13s 2.34s
% Output   : Refutation 2.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   3 unt;   6 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ f(A,z(A,B))
    | f(z(A,B),A) ),
    file('SYN332-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ f(A,z(A,B))
    | f(B,z(A,B)) ),
    file('SYN332-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ f(A,B)
    | f(B,A)
    | ~ f(z(B,A),z(B,A)) ),
    file('SYN332-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( f(A,B)
    | f(B,A)
    | ~ f(z(A,B),B) ),
    file('SYN332-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ f(A,B)
    | ~ f(B,A)
    | ~ f(z(A,B),B) ),
    file('SYN332-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( f(A,A)
    | ~ f(z(A,A),A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[10]),
    [iquote('factor,10.1.2')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( ~ f(A,A)
    | ~ f(z(A,A),A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[11]),
    [iquote('factor,11.1.2')] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( f(A,B)
    | f(A,z(A,B)) ),
    file('SYN332-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ( f(A,B)
    | f(B,z(A,B)) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,5')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ( f(A,B)
    | f(z(A,B),A) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,3')] ).

cnf(213,plain,
    f(A,A),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[32,13])]),
    [iquote('hyper,32,13,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(250,plain,
    ( f(z(A,B),B)
    | f(A,B) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[213,6,31]),
    [iquote('hyper,213,6,31')] ).

cnf(769,plain,
    ( f(A,B)
    | f(B,A) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[250,10])]),
    [iquote('hyper,250,10,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(1015,plain,
    f(A,B),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[769,6,213])]),
    [iquote('hyper,769,6,213,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(1016,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1015,14,1015]),
    [iquote('hyper,1015,14,1015')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN332-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:26:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.13/2.34  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.13/2.34  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 2.13/2.34  Wed Jul 27 11:26:29 2022
% 2.13/2.34  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 19614.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.13/2.34  set(auto).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.13/2.34  clear(print_given).
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  list(usable).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(X,Y)|f(X,z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(Y,X)|f(X,z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(X,Y)| -f(Y,X)| -f(X,z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(X,z(X,Y))| -f(z(X,Y),X).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(X,z(X,Y))|f(z(X,Y),X).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(X,z(X,Y))| -f(Y,z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(X,z(X,Y))|f(Y,z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(Y,X)|f(X,Y)| -f(z(X,Y),z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(Y,X)|f(z(X,Y),z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(X,Y)|f(z(X,Y),z(X,Y)).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(X,Y)| -f(Y,X)|f(z(X,Y),Y).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(X,Y)|f(Y,X)|f(z(X,Y),Y).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] f(X,Y)|f(Y,X)| -f(z(X,Y),Y).
% 2.13/2.34  0 [] -f(X,Y)| -f(Y,X)| -f(z(X,Y),Y).
% 2.13/2.34  end_of_list.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 2.13/2.34  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 2.13/2.34  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 2.13/2.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  ------------> process usable:
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 1 [] -f(A,B)| -f(B,A)| -f(A,z(A,B)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] f(A,z(A,B))| -f(z(A,B),A).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] -f(A,z(A,B))|f(z(A,B),A).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 4 [] f(A,z(A,B))| -f(B,z(A,B)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 5 [] -f(A,z(A,B))|f(B,z(A,B)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 6 [] -f(A,B)|f(B,A)| -f(z(B,A),z(B,A)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 7 [] -f(A,B)|f(z(A,B),z(A,B)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 8 [] f(A,B)| -f(B,A)|f(z(A,B),B).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] -f(A,B)|f(B,A)|f(z(A,B),B).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] f(A,B)|f(B,A)| -f(z(A,B),B).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -f(A,B)| -f(B,A)| -f(z(A,B),B).
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  ------------> process sos:
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 15 [] f(A,B)|f(A,z(A,B)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 16 [] f(A,B)|f(B,z(B,A)).
% 2.13/2.34  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 17 [] f(A,B)|f(z(B,A),z(B,A)).
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.40 sec ----> 1016 [hyper,1015,14,1015] $F.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 5.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.13/2.34  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.13/2.34  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.13/2.34  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  ============ end of search ============
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.13/2.34  clauses given                 16
% 2.13/2.34  clauses generated          12934
% 2.13/2.34  clauses kept                1015
% 2.13/2.34  clauses forward subsumed   11932
% 2.13/2.34  clauses back subsumed       1010
% 2.13/2.34  Kbytes malloced              976
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.13/2.34  user CPU time          0.40          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.13/2.34  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.13/2.34  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.13/2.34  
% 2.13/2.34  Process 19614 finished Wed Jul 27 11:26:31 2022
% 2.13/2.34  Otter interrupted
% 2.13/2.34  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------