TSTP Solution File: SYN332-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN332-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:56:23 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17820/SYN/SYN332-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 579] [nf = 38] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6308] [nf = 284] [nu = 2] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67896] [nf = 2848] [nu = 12] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 870456] [nf = 32410] [nu = 7424] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 9404086] [nf = 337700] [nu = 70865] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 14282736] [nf = 463616] [nu = 95299] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 14283291] [nf = 463654] [nu = 95306] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 14291715] [nf = 463902] [nu = 95997] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 14422709] [nf = 467414] [nu = 106472] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 16151040] [nf = 512109] [nu = 231227] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 91 secs [nr = 35840649] [nf = 1027739] [nu = 1486030] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 111914908
% resolvents: 109056105 factors: 2858803
% Number of unit clauses generated: 5947221
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 5.31
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 2 [3] = 2
% [4] = 2 [5] = 1 [7] = 1
% Total = 8
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 5947221 [2] = 54198460 [3] = 51769227
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] f_2 (+)6 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)6 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 8
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 104675277
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 919522
% Number of successful unifications: 111914908
% Number of unification failures: 135524200
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 402303491
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 36842451
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 5351367
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 1637556
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 10
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 3
% Number of states in UCFA table: 59
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 76
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.78
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 36
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 247439108
% ConstructUnitClause() = 5351375
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 7.46 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 373050
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------