TSTP Solution File: SYN332+1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SYN332+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:50:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sG,sG)
    | ~ big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG))
    | ~ big_f(sG,sG) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG))
    | big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG)
    | big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG)
    | big_f(sG,sG)
    | big_f(sG,sG) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG))
    | big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)
    | big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG)
    | big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sG,sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG))
    | ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
    | big_f(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG))
    | big_f(sG,sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
    | big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
    | big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)))
    | big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

cnf(g10,plain,
    ( big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
    | big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN332+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:47:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.38  % symbols: 5
% 0.19/0.38  % clauses: 16
% 0.19/0.38  % start clauses: 14
% 0.19/0.38  % iterative deepening steps: 93
% 0.19/0.38  % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.19/0.38  % literal attempts: 39750
% 0.19/0.38  % depth failures: 30690
% 0.19/0.38  % regularity failures: 3102
% 0.19/0.38  % tautology failures: 2316
% 0.19/0.38  % reductions: 158
% 0.19/0.38  % extensions: 38631
% 0.19/0.38  % SAT variables: 2581
% 0.19/0.38  % SAT clauses: 3768
% 0.19/0.38  % WalkSAT solutions: 3743
% 0.19/0.38  % CDCL solutions: 7
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------