TSTP Solution File: SYN332+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SYN332+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:50:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
( ~ big_f(sG,sG)
| ~ big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG))
| ~ big_f(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG))
| big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG)
| big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG)
| big_f(sG,sG)
| big_f(sG,sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG))
| big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)
| big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sG)
| big_f(sG,sK0(sG,sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ big_f(sG,sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG))
| ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| big_f(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ big_f(sK0(sG,sG),sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG))
| big_f(sG,sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)))
| big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))
| big_f(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG),sK0(sK0(sK0(sG,sG),sG),sG))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN332+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:47:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.38 % symbols: 5
% 0.19/0.38 % clauses: 16
% 0.19/0.38 % start clauses: 14
% 0.19/0.38 % iterative deepening steps: 93
% 0.19/0.38 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.19/0.38 % literal attempts: 39750
% 0.19/0.38 % depth failures: 30690
% 0.19/0.38 % regularity failures: 3102
% 0.19/0.38 % tautology failures: 2316
% 0.19/0.38 % reductions: 158
% 0.19/0.38 % extensions: 38631
% 0.19/0.38 % SAT variables: 2581
% 0.19/0.38 % SAT clauses: 3768
% 0.19/0.38 % WalkSAT solutions: 3743
% 0.19/0.38 % CDCL solutions: 7
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.38 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------