%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SYN331+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 13:14:51 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  15   ~;  17   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   5 sgn   8   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] :
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_f(X1,X3)
     => ( big_f(X2,X3)
       => ( ( big_f(X1,X2)
          <=> big_f(X3,X3) )
         => ( ( big_f(X2,X1)
              | big_f(X3,X3) )
           => ( big_f(X3,X1)
              | big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpCgBWN0/sel_SYN331+1.p_1',church_46_14_3) ).

fof(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( big_f(X1,X3)
       => ( big_f(X2,X3)
         => ( ( big_f(X1,X2)
            <=> big_f(X3,X3) )
           => ( ( big_f(X2,X1)
                | big_f(X3,X3) )
             => ( big_f(X3,X1)
                | big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

fof(3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( big_f(X1,X3)
      & big_f(X2,X3)
      & ( ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | big_f(X3,X3) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X3,X3)
        | big_f(X1,X2) )
      & ( big_f(X2,X1)
        | big_f(X3,X3) )
      & ~ big_f(X3,X1)
      & ~ big_f(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

fof(4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
    ? [X6] :
      ( big_f(X4,X6)
      & big_f(X5,X6)
      & ( ~ big_f(X4,X5)
        | big_f(X6,X6) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X6,X6)
        | big_f(X4,X5) )
      & ( big_f(X5,X4)
        | big_f(X6,X6) )
      & ~ big_f(X6,X4)
      & ~ big_f(X6,X5) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( big_f(X4,esk1_2(X4,X5))
      & big_f(X5,esk1_2(X4,X5))
      & ( ~ big_f(X4,X5)
        | big_f(esk1_2(X4,X5),esk1_2(X4,X5)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(esk1_2(X4,X5),esk1_2(X4,X5))
        | big_f(X4,X5) )
      & ( big_f(X5,X4)
        | big_f(esk1_2(X4,X5),esk1_2(X4,X5)) )
      & ~ big_f(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
      & ~ big_f(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

cnf(7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))
    | big_f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | big_f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[9,8,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(15,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X3,X3),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[13,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[9,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[25,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[7,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    33,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN331+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpCgBWN0/sel_SYN331+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SYN331+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN331+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SYN/SYN331+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------