TSTP Solution File: SYN331+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SYN331+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:45:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 120.44s 121.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 120.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN331+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 18:44:55 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 120.44/121.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.44/121.53  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 120.44/121.53  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 120.44/121.53  % Transform   :cnf
% 120.44/121.53  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 120.44/121.53  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 120.44/121.53  
% 120.44/121.53  % Result      :Theorem 120.000000s
% 120.44/121.53  % Output      :CNFRefutation 120.000000s
% 120.44/121.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.44/121.55  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.44/121.55  % File     : SYN331+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 120.44/121.55  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 120.44/121.55  % Problem  : Church problem 46.14 (3)
% 120.44/121.55  % Version  : Especial.
% 120.44/121.55  % English  :
% 120.44/121.55  
% 120.44/121.55  % Refs     : [Chu56] Church (1956), Introduction to Mathematical Logic I
% 120.44/121.55  % Source   : [Chu56]
% 120.44/121.55  % Names    : 46.14 (3) [Chu56]
% 120.44/121.55  
% 120.44/121.55  % Status   : Theorem
% 120.44/121.55  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.22 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 120.44/121.55  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   8 avg)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   0   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
% 120.44/121.56  %                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   9 avg)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 120.44/121.56  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   1   !;   2   ?)
% 120.44/121.56  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 120.44/121.56  
% 120.44/121.56  % Comments :
% 120.44/121.56  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.44/121.56  fof(church_46_14_3,conjecture,
% 120.44/121.56      ? [X,Y] :
% 120.44/121.56      ! [Z] :
% 120.44/121.56        ( big_f(X,Z)
% 120.44/121.56       => ( big_f(Y,Z)
% 120.44/121.56         => ( ( big_f(X,Y)
% 120.44/121.56            <=> big_f(Z,Z) )
% 120.44/121.56           => ( ( big_f(Y,X)
% 120.44/121.56                | big_f(Z,Z) )
% 120.44/121.56             => ( big_f(Z,X)
% 120.44/121.56                | big_f(Z,Y) ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 120.44/121.56  
% 120.44/121.56  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.44/121.56  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.44/121.56  % Proof found
% 120.44/121.56  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 120.44/121.56  % SZS output start Proof
% 120.44/121.57  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 120.44/121.57  %VarNum:30(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 120.44/121.57  %MaxLitNum:2
% 120.44/121.57  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 120.44/121.57  %SharedTerms:0
% 120.44/121.57  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% 120.44/121.57  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 120.44/121.57  [1]P1(x11,f1(x12,x11))
% 120.44/121.57  [2]P1(x21,f1(x21,x22))
% 120.44/121.57  [3]~P1(f1(x31,x32),x32)
% 120.44/121.57  [4]~P1(f1(x41,x42),x41)
% 120.44/121.57  [5]P1(x51,x52)+P1(f1(x52,x51),f1(x52,x51))
% 120.44/121.57  [6]~P1(x61,x62)+P1(f1(x61,x62),f1(x61,x62))
% 120.44/121.57  [7]P1(x71,x72)+~P1(f1(x71,x72),f1(x71,x72))
% 120.44/121.57  %EqnAxiom
% 120.44/121.57  
% 120.44/121.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.61/121.58  cnf(8,plain,
% 120.61/121.58     (P1(f1(f1(f1(x81,x82),x82),f1(f1(x81,x82),x82)),f1(f1(f1(x81,x82),x82),f1(f1(x81,x82),x82)))),
% 120.61/121.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,7])).
% 120.61/121.58  cnf(13,plain,
% 120.61/121.58     (P1(f1(f1(x131,x132),x132),f1(f1(x131,x132),x132))),
% 120.61/121.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,7])).
% 120.61/121.58  cnf(15,plain,
% 120.61/121.58     ($false),
% 120.61/121.58     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,3,7]),
% 120.61/121.58     ['proof']).
% 120.61/121.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 120.61/121.58  % Total time :120.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------