TSTP Solution File: SYN330+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN330+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:51:19 EDT 2022
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 8.38s 2.45s
% Output : Saturation 8.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_f(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wr1ymxoi/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_8,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_f(X2,X1) ),
i_0_3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
| big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))
| big_f(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))
| ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_7,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_2,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN330+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:14:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.38/2.45 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.38/2.45 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.38/2.45 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.38/2.45 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___041_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 8.38/2.45 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.38/2.45 #
% 8.38/2.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.38/2.45
% 8.38/2.45 # No proof found!
% 8.38/2.45 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 8.38/2.45 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 8.38/2.45
% 8.38/2.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.38/2.45 # User time : 0.023 s
% 8.38/2.45 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.38/2.45 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 8.38/2.45 # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 8.38/2.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------