TSTP Solution File: SYN327+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SYN327+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:06:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.57s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  43   ~;  23   |;  32   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   1 sgn;  13   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( big_f(X1,X0)
     => ( ( big_f(X0,X1)
         => ( ~ big_f(X0,X2)
           => ( big_f(X2,X1)
              & big_f(X1,X0) ) ) )
        & ( big_f(X0,X2)
         => big_f(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_12_2) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( big_f(X1,X0)
       => ( ( big_f(X0,X1)
           => ( ~ big_f(X0,X2)
             => ( big_f(X2,X1)
                & big_f(X1,X0) ) ) )
          & ( big_f(X0,X2)
           => big_f(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X1)
            | ~ big_f(X1,X0) )
          & ~ big_f(X0,X2)
          & big_f(X0,X1) )
        | ( ~ big_f(X0,X1)
          & big_f(X0,X2) ) )
      & big_f(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X1)
            | ~ big_f(X1,X0) )
          & ~ big_f(X0,X2)
          & big_f(X0,X1) )
        | ( ~ big_f(X0,X1)
          & big_f(X0,X2) ) )
      & big_f(X1,X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X1)
              | ~ big_f(X1,X0) )
            & ~ big_f(X0,X2)
            & big_f(X0,X1) )
          | ( ~ big_f(X0,X1)
            & big_f(X0,X2) ) )
        & big_f(X1,X0) )
   => ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X1)
              | ~ big_f(X1,sK0) )
            & ~ big_f(sK0,X2)
            & big_f(sK0,X1) )
          | ( ~ big_f(sK0,X1)
            & big_f(sK0,X2) ) )
        & big_f(X1,sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X1)
                | ~ big_f(X1,sK0) )
              & ~ big_f(sK0,X2)
              & big_f(sK0,X1) )
            | ( ~ big_f(sK0,X1)
              & big_f(sK0,X2) ) )
          & big_f(X1,sK0) )
     => ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(sK1(X1),X1)
              | ~ big_f(X1,sK0) )
            & ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1))
            & big_f(sK0,X1) )
          | ( ~ big_f(sK0,X1)
            & big_f(sK0,sK1(X1)) ) )
        & big_f(X1,sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ big_f(sK1(X1),X1)
            | ~ big_f(X1,sK0) )
          & ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1))
          & big_f(sK0,X1) )
        | ( ~ big_f(sK0,X1)
          & big_f(sK0,sK1(X1)) ) )
      & big_f(X1,sK0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f4,f6,f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X1] : big_f(X1,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1(X1),X1)
      | ~ big_f(X1,sK0)
      | big_f(sK0,sK1(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1(X0),X0)
    | ~ big_f(X0,sK0)
    | big_f(sK0,sK1(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X0))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X0,sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(sK0))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1(sK0),sK0)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK0)
    | big_f(sK0,sK1(sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_126,plain,
    big_f(sK1(sK0),sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

cnf(c_127,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_56,c_55,c_54]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN327+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.19/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:46:53 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.57/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.57/1.17  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.57/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.57/1.17  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  clauses                                 4
% 1.57/1.17  conjectures                             3
% 1.57/1.17  EPR                                     1
% 1.57/1.17  Horn                                    3
% 1.57/1.17  unary                                   1
% 1.57/1.17  binary                                  3
% 1.57/1.17  lits                                    7
% 1.57/1.17  lits eq                                 0
% 1.57/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.57/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.57/1.17  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.57/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 1.57/1.17  AC symbols                              0
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ 
% 1.57/1.17  Current options:
% 1.57/1.17  ------ 
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.57/1.17  
% 1.57/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------