TSTP Solution File: SYN327+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN327+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 17 ~; 11 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn; 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_12_2,conjecture,
! [X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( big_f(X2,X1)
=> ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
=> big_f(X1,X2) )
& ( big_f(X1,X2)
=> ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
=> ( big_f(X2,X1)
& big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.phyGWkLGtM/E---3.1_15077.p',church_46_12_2) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( big_f(X2,X1)
=> ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
=> big_f(X1,X2) )
& ( big_f(X1,X2)
=> ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
=> ( big_f(X2,X1)
& big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_12_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X5] :
( big_f(X5,esk1_0)
& ( big_f(esk1_0,X5)
| big_f(esk1_0,esk2_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ big_f(esk1_0,esk2_1(X5))
| big_f(esk1_0,esk2_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ big_f(X5,esk1_0)
| ~ big_f(esk2_1(X5),X5)
| big_f(esk1_0,esk2_1(X5)) )
& ( big_f(esk1_0,X5)
| ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5) )
& ( ~ big_f(esk1_0,esk2_1(X5))
| ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5) )
& ( ~ big_f(X5,esk1_0)
| ~ big_f(esk2_1(X5),X5)
| ~ big_f(esk1_0,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ big_f(esk2_1(X1),X1)
| ~ big_f(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(esk2_1(X1),X1)
| ~ big_f(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]),c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN327+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:35:44 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.phyGWkLGtM/E---3.1_15077.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # sh5l with pid 15167 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 15172 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 368
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------