TSTP Solution File: SYN326+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN326+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 8 ~; 8 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 1 sgn; 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_12_1,conjecture,
? [X1] :
! [X2,X3] :
( ( ( big_f(X2,X3)
=> ( big_g(X2)
=> big_h(X1) ) )
=> big_f(X1,X1) )
=> ( ( ( big_f(X3,X1)
=> big_g(X1) )
=> big_h(X3) )
=> ( big_f(X1,X2)
=> big_f(X3,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RK5N8QtMKG/E---3.1_28897.p',church_46_12_1) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
! [X2,X3] :
( ( ( big_f(X2,X3)
=> ( big_g(X2)
=> big_h(X1) ) )
=> big_f(X1,X1) )
=> ( ( ( big_f(X3,X1)
=> big_g(X1) )
=> big_h(X3) )
=> ( big_f(X1,X2)
=> big_f(X3,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_12_1]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4] :
( ( big_f(esk1_1(X4),esk2_1(X4))
| big_f(X4,X4) )
& ( big_g(esk1_1(X4))
| big_f(X4,X4) )
& ( ~ big_h(X4)
| big_f(X4,X4) )
& ( big_f(esk2_1(X4),X4)
| big_h(esk2_1(X4)) )
& ( ~ big_g(X4)
| big_h(esk2_1(X4)) )
& big_f(X4,esk1_1(X4))
& ~ big_f(esk2_1(X4),esk2_1(X4)) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X1)
| ~ big_h(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(esk2_1(X1))
| ~ big_g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ big_f(esk2_1(X1),esk2_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(esk1_1(X1))
| big_f(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ big_g(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SYN326+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:51:59 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RK5N8QtMKG/E---3.1_28897.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 28976 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 28980 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting SAT001_CO_MinMin_p005000_rr with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 14
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 428
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------