TSTP Solution File: SYN323+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN323+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 14 ~; 8 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 4 sgn; 7 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_4_2,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( big_f(X2,X1)
=> big_f(X1,X2) )
=> big_g(X2,X1) )
=> ~ ! [X2] :
( ( big_f(X2,X1)
=> big_f(X1,X2) )
=> ~ big_g(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CXCABK3jV9/E---3.1_11492.p',church_46_4_2) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( big_f(X2,X1)
=> big_f(X1,X2) )
=> big_g(X2,X1) )
=> ~ ! [X2] :
( ( big_f(X2,X1)
=> big_f(X1,X2) )
=> ~ big_g(X2,X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_4_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X3,X4,X5] :
( ( big_f(X4,X3)
| big_g(X4,X3) )
& ( ~ big_f(X3,X4)
| big_g(X4,X3) )
& ( big_f(X5,X3)
| ~ big_g(X5,X3) )
& ( ~ big_f(X3,X5)
| ~ big_g(X5,X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(X2,X1)
| ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_g(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| big_g(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ big_f(X1,X2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_g(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
big_g(X1,X2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : SYN323+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:14:59 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CXCABK3jV9/E---3.1_11492.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # new_bool_1 with pid 11571 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11575 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 250
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.18/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------