TSTP Solution File: SYN321+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN321+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:09:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 10 ~; 8 |; 3 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 10 sgn 16 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_3_2,conjecture,
? [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : big_f(X1,X3)
=> ! [X3] : big_g(X1,X3) )
=> ( ! [X3] :
( big_g(X3,X3)
=> big_f(X3,X2) )
=> ( big_f(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] : big_g(X1,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_3_2) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : big_f(X1,X3)
=> ! [X3] : big_g(X1,X3) )
=> ( ! [X3] :
( big_g(X3,X3)
=> big_f(X3,X2) )
=> ( big_f(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] : big_g(X1,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_3_2]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X12,X13,X14] :
( ( ~ big_f(X4,X5)
| big_g(X4,X6) )
& ( ~ big_g(X8,X8)
| big_f(X8,X7) )
& ( ~ big_f(X9,X10)
| ~ big_g(X9,esk1_1(X9)) )
& ( big_f(X12,X13)
| big_g(X12,X14) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_g(X1,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1,X2)
| big_g(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_f(X1,X2)
| ~ big_g(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1,X2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(X1,X3)
| ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ big_g(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
big_g(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN321+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:26:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------