TSTP Solution File: SYN319+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN319+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:20:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 1 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
( ~ big_h(skc4)
| big_h(u) ),
file('SYN319+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ big(u)
| big_h(u) ),
file('SYN319+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ big_g(u)
| big_h(u) ),
file('SYN319+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
( big(u)
| skP0(v,u) ),
file('SYN319+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( ~ big_h(skc3)
| ~ big_h(skc4) ),
file('SYN319+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ skP0(skf1(u),u)
| big_g(v) ),
file('SYN319+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,plain,
~ big_h(skc4),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[6,2]),
[iquote('0:MRR:6.0,2.1')] ).
cnf(17,plain,
big_g(u),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[8]),
[iquote('1:Spt:8.1')] ).
cnf(18,plain,
big_h(u),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[4,17]),
[iquote('1:MRR:4.0,17.0')] ).
cnf(20,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[18,10]),
[iquote('1:UnC:18.0,10.0')] ).
cnf(22,plain,
~ skP0(skf1(u),u),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[8]),
[iquote('1:Spt:20.0,8.0')] ).
cnf(23,plain,
~ big(skc4),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,10]),
[iquote('0:Res:3.1,10.0')] ).
cnf(25,plain,
big(u),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,22]),
[iquote('1:Res:5.1,22.0')] ).
cnf(26,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[25,23]),
[iquote('1:UnC:25.0,23.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN319+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:20:30 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.45 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS derived 7 clauses, backtracked 6 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 21 clauses.
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS allocated 97568 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 14 :
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.45 Formulae used in the proof : church_46_2_5
% 0.20/0.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------