TSTP Solution File: SYN317+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SYN317+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 05:01:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.98s 1.17s
% Output   : Proof 2.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem  : SYN317+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:46:50 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.56/0.61          ____       _                          
% 0.56/0.61    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.56/0.61   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.56/0.61  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.56/0.61  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.56/0.62  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.56/0.62  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.56/0.62  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.56/0.62  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.56/0.62  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.70/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.23/0.91  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.35/0.96  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.35/0.98  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 1.47/1.07  Prover 0: gave up
% 1.47/1.07  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.66/1.09  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.66/1.13  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 1.98/1.17  Prover 1: proved (102ms)
% 1.98/1.17  
% 1.98/1.17  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 1.98/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.98/1.17  
% 1.98/1.17  Generating proof ... found it (size 21)
% 2.36/1.33  
% 2.36/1.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.36/1.33  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 2.36/1.33  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (big_f(v6) = v5) |  ~ (big_f(v6) = v4)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ (big_g(v6) = v5) |  ~ (big_g(v6) = v4)) & ((big_f(v0) = v2 & big_g(v1) = v3 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v4) = v5)) &  ! [v4] :  ~ (big_g(v4) = 0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0)) | (big_f(v0) = v1 & big_g(v0) = v2 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v4) = v5)) &  ! [v4] :  ~ (big_g(v4) = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 2.36/1.37  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 yields:
% 2.36/1.37  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_f(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_f(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_g(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_g(v2) = v0)) & ((big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 & big_g(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0)) | (big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2 & big_g(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0) | all_0_1_1 = 0)))
% 2.36/1.37  |
% 2.36/1.37  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 2.36/1.37  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_f(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_f(v2) = v0))
% 2.36/1.37  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (big_g(v2) = v1) |  ~ (big_g(v2) = v0))
% 2.36/1.38  | (4) (big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 & big_g(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0)) | (big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2 & big_g(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0) | all_0_1_1 = 0))
% 2.36/1.38  |
% 2.36/1.38  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (4), into two cases.
% 2.36/1.38  |-Branch one:
% 2.36/1.38  | (5) big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 & big_g(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 2.36/1.38  |
% 2.36/1.38  	| Applying alpha-rule on (5) yields:
% 2.36/1.38  	| (6)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) | all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.36/1.38  	| (7) big_g(all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 2.36/1.38  	| (8) big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1
% 2.36/1.38  	| (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1))
% 2.36/1.38  	| (10)  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0)
% 2.36/1.38  	|
% 2.36/1.38  	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_1_1, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 2.36/1.38  	| (11) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.36/1.38  	|
% 2.36/1.38  	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2 yields:
% 2.36/1.38  	| (12)  ~ (big_g(all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 2.36/1.38  	|
% 2.36/1.38  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6), into two cases.
% 2.36/1.38  	|-Branch one:
% 2.36/1.38  	| (13)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.36/1.38  	|
% 2.36/1.38  		| Equations (11) can reduce 13 to:
% 2.36/1.38  		| (14) $false
% 2.36/1.38  		|
% 2.36/1.38  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.36/1.38  	|-Branch two:
% 2.36/1.38  	| (11) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.36/1.38  	| (16) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 2.36/1.38  	|
% 2.36/1.38  		| From (16) and (7) follows:
% 2.36/1.38  		| (17) big_g(all_0_2_2) = 0
% 2.36/1.38  		|
% 2.36/1.38  		| Using (17) and (12) yields:
% 2.36/1.38  		| (18) $false
% 2.36/1.38  		|
% 2.36/1.38  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.36/1.38  |-Branch two:
% 2.36/1.38  | (19) big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2 & big_g(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0) | all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 2.36/1.39  |
% 2.36/1.39  	| Applying alpha-rule on (19) yields:
% 2.36/1.39  	| (20) big_g(all_0_3_3) = all_0_1_1
% 2.36/1.39  	| (21) big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2
% 2.36/1.39  	| (22)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0) | all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.36/1.39  	| (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (big_f(v0) = v1))
% 2.36/1.39  	| (10)  ! [v0] :  ~ (big_g(v0) = 0)
% 2.36/1.39  	|
% 2.36/1.39  	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms big_f(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 2.36/1.39  	| (25) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 2.36/1.39  	|
% 2.36/1.39  	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3 yields:
% 2.36/1.39  	| (26)  ~ (big_g(all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 2.36/1.39  	|
% 2.36/1.39  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (22), into two cases.
% 2.36/1.39  	|-Branch one:
% 2.36/1.39  	| (27)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 2.36/1.39  	|
% 2.36/1.39  		| Equations (25) can reduce 27 to:
% 2.36/1.39  		| (14) $false
% 2.36/1.39  		|
% 2.36/1.39  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.36/1.39  	|-Branch two:
% 2.51/1.39  	| (25) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 2.51/1.39  	| (11) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 2.51/1.39  	|
% 2.51/1.39  		| From (11) and (20) follows:
% 2.51/1.39  		| (31) big_g(all_0_3_3) = 0
% 2.51/1.39  		|
% 2.51/1.39  		| Using (31) and (26) yields:
% 2.51/1.39  		| (18) $false
% 2.51/1.39  		|
% 2.51/1.39  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 2.51/1.39  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.51/1.39  
% 2.51/1.39  763ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------