TSTP Solution File: SYN311-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN311-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:59:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.86s 1.03s
% Output : Refutation 0.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause1,negated_conjecture,
( p(X,Y,Z,U)
| ~ p(Y,Z,U,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause1) ).
cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture,
( p(X,Y,Z,U)
| ~ p(U,Z,Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause2) ).
cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
( p(X,Y,Z,g(U))
| ~ p(X,Y,Z,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
cnf(clause4,negated_conjecture,
( p(f(X),Y,Z,U)
| ~ p(X,Y,Z,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause4) ).
cnf(clause5,negated_conjecture,
p(a,b,c,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).
cnf(clause6,negated_conjecture,
~ p(f(g(d)),f(g(c)),f(g(b)),f(g(a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause6) ).
cnf(7,plain,
p(d,a,b,c),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause1,clause5]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
~ p(g(d),f(g(c)),f(g(b)),f(g(a))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause4,clause6]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
p(d,a,b,g(c)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause3,7]) ).
cnf(44,plain,
p(g(c),d,a,b),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause1,17]) ).
cnf(94,plain,
p(g(c),d,a,g(b)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause3,44]) ).
cnf(246,plain,
p(f(g(c)),d,a,g(b)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause4,94]) ).
cnf(972,plain,
~ p(f(g(a)),f(g(b)),f(g(c)),g(d)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause2,11]) ).
cnf(1027,plain,
p(g(b),f(g(c)),d,a),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause1,246]) ).
cnf(2140,plain,
~ p(f(g(a)),f(g(b)),f(g(c)),d),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause3,972]) ).
cnf(2231,plain,
p(f(g(b)),f(g(c)),d,a),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause4,1027]) ).
cnf(2572,plain,
~ p(g(a),f(g(b)),f(g(c)),d),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause4,2140]) ).
cnf(2583,plain,
~ p(f(g(b)),f(g(c)),d,g(a)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause1,2572]) ).
cnf(4045,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause3,2583]),2231]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYN311-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:47:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 "."
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T14:47:15
% 0.19/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n010.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T14:47:15
% 0.86/1.03
% 0.86/1.03
% 0.86/1.03 #||
% 0.86/1.03 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.86/1.03 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.86/1.04 ||#
% 0.86/1.04
% 0.86/1.04 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.86/1.04 ; 13061 formulas have been input or derived (from 1658 formulas).
% 0.86/1.04 ; 4045 (31%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.86/1.04 ; 4045 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.86/1.04 ;
% 0.86/1.04 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.002 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.000 0% Assert (6 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.219 40% Process new row (11,256 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.146 27% Resolution (3,314 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.020 4% Paramodulation (1,657 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (4 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.001 0% Clause clause subsumption (6 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.069 13% Forward simplification (11,256 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.023 4% Backward simplification (4,045 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.066 12% Other
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.547 Total
% 0.86/1.04 ; 0.562 Real time
% 0.86/1.04 ;
% 0.86/1.04 ; Term-hash-array has 4,151 terms in all.
% 0.86/1.04 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 entries (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.86/1.04 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5 nodes (5 at peak, 5 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.86/1.04 ; Retrieved 5 possibly forward subsuming rows in 4 calls.
% 0.86/1.04 ; Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 4 calls.
% 0.86/1.04 ; Path-index has 4,155 entries (4,155 at peak, 4,155 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.86/1.04 ; Path-index has 490 nodes (490 at peak, 490 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.86/1.04 ; Trie-index has 4,155 entries (4,155 at peak, 4,155 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.86/1.04 ; Trie-index has 10,147 nodes (10,147 at peak, 10,147 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.86/1.04 ; Retrieved 7,212 generalization terms in 11,251 calls.
% 0.86/1.04 ; Retrieved 4,040 instance terms in 4,040 calls.
% 0.86/1.04 ; Retrieved 34,446 unifiable terms in 23,016 calls.
% 0.86/1.04 ;
% 0.86/1.04 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.86/1.04 ; 1 with value 18 2 with value 19
% 0.86/1.04 ; The agenda of rows to give has 2387 entries:
% 0.86/1.04 ; 21 with value (4 18) 912 with value (4 20) 475 with value (4 21)
% 0.86/1.04 ; 979 with value (4 19)
% 0.86/1.04 Evaluation took:
% 0.86/1.04 0.563 seconds of real time
% 0.86/1.04 0.507674 seconds of user run time
% 0.86/1.04 0.055186 seconds of system run time
% 0.86/1.04 [Run times include 0.037 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.86/1.04 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.86/1.04 0 page faults and
% 0.86/1.04 38,302,024 bytes consed.
% 0.86/1.04 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.86/1.04 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T14:47:16
% 0.86/1.04 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.86/1.04 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------