TSTP Solution File: SYN310-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN310-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:30:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.78s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X0,X1,X2)
| p(X2,X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X0,X1,X2)
| p(X1,X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause2) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X0,X1,g(X2))
| p(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(f(X0),X1,X2)
| p(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause4) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ p(a,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
p(f(g(a)),f(g(b)),f(g(c))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause6) ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
g(a) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_78,plain,
f(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_79,plain,
g(b) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_80,plain,
f(sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_81,plain,
g(c) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_82,plain,
f(sP4_iProver_def) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
p(sP1_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_81,c_82,c_79,c_80,c_77,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
~ p(a,b,c),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).
cnf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(f(X0),X1,X2)
| p(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).
cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X0,X1,g(X2))
| p(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).
cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X0,X1,X2)
| p(X1,X0,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X0,X1,X2)
| p(X2,X1,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_239,plain,
( ~ p(X0,X1,sP0_iProver_def)
| p(X0,X1,a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_86]) ).
cnf(c_243,plain,
( ~ p(sP1_iProver_def,X0,X1)
| p(sP0_iProver_def,X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_85]) ).
cnf(c_247,plain,
( ~ p(X0,X1,sP2_iProver_def)
| p(X0,X1,b) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_86]) ).
cnf(c_251,plain,
( ~ p(sP3_iProver_def,X0,X1)
| p(sP2_iProver_def,X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_85]) ).
cnf(c_259,plain,
( ~ p(X0,X1,sP4_iProver_def)
| p(X0,X1,c) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_86]) ).
cnf(c_263,plain,
( ~ p(sP5_iProver_def,X0,X1)
| p(sP4_iProver_def,X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_85]) ).
cnf(c_275,plain,
p(sP0_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_243]) ).
cnf(c_277,plain,
p(sP5_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_275,c_88]) ).
cnf(c_280,plain,
p(sP3_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_277,c_87]) ).
cnf(c_287,plain,
p(sP3_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def,a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_280,c_239]) ).
cnf(c_339,plain,
p(sP2_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def,a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_251]) ).
cnf(c_501,plain,
p(a,sP5_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_88]) ).
cnf(c_533,plain,
p(a,sP5_iProver_def,b),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_501,c_247]) ).
cnf(c_751,plain,
p(b,sP5_iProver_def,a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_533,c_88]) ).
cnf(c_759,plain,
p(sP5_iProver_def,b,a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_751,c_87]) ).
cnf(c_762,plain,
p(sP4_iProver_def,b,a),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_759,c_263]) ).
cnf(c_952,plain,
p(a,b,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_762,c_88]) ).
cnf(c_964,plain,
p(a,b,c),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_952,c_259]) ).
cnf(c_965,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_964,c_84]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN310-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:52:25 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.78/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.78/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.78/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 clauses 12
% 1.78/1.18 conjectures 6
% 1.78/1.18 EPR 4
% 1.78/1.18 Horn 12
% 1.78/1.18 unary 8
% 1.78/1.18 binary 4
% 1.78/1.18 lits 16
% 1.78/1.18 lits eq 6
% 1.78/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 1.78/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.78/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 1.78/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.78/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------
% 1.78/1.18 Current options:
% 1.78/1.18 ------
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.78/1.18
% 1.78/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------