TSTP Solution File: SYN303-10 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SYN303-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:49 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.40s
% Output   : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause5)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    p(a,f(X1)) != true,
    clause5,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(p(f(X1),f(X2)),true,p(X1,X2),true) = true,
    clause3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(p(X1,X2),true,p(f(X1),f(X2)),true) = true,
    clause4,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(p(X1,X2),true,p(X2,X1),true) = true,
    clause2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    p(X1,X1) = true,
    clause1,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem    : SYN303-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:54:34 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.39  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ggfPzk3Da3/E---3.1_20236.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # sh5l with pid 20319 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.40  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.40  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with pid 20327 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.40  # Result found by G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.40  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.40  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.40  # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # No proof found!
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # Processed clauses                    : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Paramodulations                      : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Total rewrite steps                  : 12
% 0.15/0.40  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.15/0.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.15/0.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.15/0.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Condensation attempts                : 6
% 0.15/0.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 166
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Total time               : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.40  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.15/0.40  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------