TSTP Solution File: SYN303-10 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN303-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:14:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Saturation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause5)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p(a,f(X1)) != true,
clause5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p(f(X1),f(X2)),true,p(X1,X2),true) = true,
clause3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p(X1,X2),true,p(f(X1),f(X2)),true) = true,
clause4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
ifeq(p(X1,X2),true,p(X2,X1),true) = true,
clause2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p(X1,X1) = true,
clause1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SYN303-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:52:14 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sEulLlSCnB/E---3.1_29559.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 29639 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with pid 29643 completed with status 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # No proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 166
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1424 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------