TSTP Solution File: SYN301-1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SYN301-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 03:06:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.62s 1.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (   7 unt;   2 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   67 (   0 equ;  40 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  13 usr;   5 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s4(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    m0(e,d,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_4) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    p0(b,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).

cnf(c_78,plain,
    q0(d,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_29) ).

cnf(c_86,plain,
    n0(b,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_37) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( ~ n0(X0,X1)
    | l1(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_002) ).

cnf(c_212,plain,
    ( ~ p0(X0,X0)
    | s1(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).

cnf(c_213,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X0,X1)
    | ~ s1(X2)
    | s1(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_126) ).

cnf(c_220,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ p0(X3,X3)
    | ~ s1(X1)
    | l2(X2,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_133) ).

cnf(c_333,plain,
    ( ~ l2(X0,X0)
    | p3(X0,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_246) ).

cnf(c_386,plain,
    ( ~ p3(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ l1(X3,X1)
    | s4(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_299) ).

cnf(c_419,plain,
    p0(b,b),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).

cnf(c_427,plain,
    ( ~ p0(b,b)
    | s1(b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_212]) ).

cnf(c_791,plain,
    ( ~ p0(X0,X0)
    | ~ sP46_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP46_iProver_split])],[c_220]) ).

cnf(c_792,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X0,X1,X2)
    | l2(X2,X2)
    | ~ s1(X1)
    | ~ sP47_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP47_iProver_split])],[c_220]) ).

cnf(c_793,plain,
    ( sP46_iProver_split
    | sP47_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_220]) ).

cnf(c_794,plain,
    ( ~ s1(X0)
    | ~ sP48_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP48_iProver_split])],[c_213]) ).

cnf(c_795,plain,
    ( ~ q0(X0,X1)
    | s1(X0)
    | ~ sP49_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP49_iProver_split])],[c_213]) ).

cnf(c_796,plain,
    ( sP48_iProver_split
    | sP49_iProver_split ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_213]) ).

cnf(c_848,plain,
    ( ~ s1(b)
    | ~ sP48_iProver_split ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_794]) ).

cnf(c_856,plain,
    ( ~ p0(b,b)
    | ~ sP46_iProver_split ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_791]) ).

cnf(c_932,plain,
    ( ~ n0(b,a)
    | l1(a,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).

cnf(c_941,plain,
    ( ~ q0(d,X0)
    | ~ sP49_iProver_split
    | s1(d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_795]) ).

cnf(c_942,plain,
    ( ~ q0(d,b)
    | ~ sP49_iProver_split
    | s1(d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_941]) ).

cnf(c_1133,plain,
    ( ~ m0(e,d,a)
    | ~ s1(d)
    | ~ sP47_iProver_split
    | l2(a,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_792]) ).

cnf(c_1359,plain,
    ( ~ p3(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ l1(a,X1)
    | s4(a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_386]) ).

cnf(c_1666,plain,
    ( ~ p3(X0,a,X1)
    | ~ l1(a,a)
    | s4(a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1359]) ).

cnf(c_1961,plain,
    ( ~ p3(a,a,a)
    | ~ l1(a,a)
    | s4(a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1666]) ).

cnf(c_1962,plain,
    ( ~ l2(a,a)
    | p3(a,a,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_333]) ).

cnf(c_1966,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1962,c_1961,c_1133,c_942,c_932,c_856,c_848,c_796,c_793,c_427,c_53,c_419,c_78,c_86,c_49]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SYN301-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:48:08 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.62/1.13  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.62/1.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------  iProver source info
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 2.62/1.13  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 2.62/1.13  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.62/1.13  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 86 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Preprocessing...------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.62/1.13   gs_s  sp: 88 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Proving...
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  clauses                                 333
% 2.62/1.13  conjectures                             1
% 2.62/1.13  EPR                                     333
% 2.62/1.13  Horn                                    290
% 2.62/1.13  unary                                   51
% 2.62/1.13  binary                                  137
% 2.62/1.13  lits                                    812
% 2.62/1.13  lits eq                                 0
% 2.62/1.13  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.62/1.13  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.62/1.13  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.62/1.13  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 2.62/1.13  AC symbols                              0
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ 
% 2.62/1.13  Current options:
% 2.62/1.13  ------ 
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  ------ Proving...
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.62/1.13  
% 2.62/1.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------