TSTP Solution File: SYN299-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN299-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:57:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.82s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 57 ( 0 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_125) ).
cnf(rule_002,axiom,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_002) ).
cnf(rule_189,axiom,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_189) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_186,axiom,
( q2(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ l1(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_186) ).
cnf(axiom_15,axiom,
n0(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_15) ).
cnf(rule_273,axiom,
( s3(X1,X2)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_273) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_38,axiom,
m0(b,a,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_38) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_125]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_002]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( q2(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ l1(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_186]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( l1(X1,X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
n0(a,b),
axiom_15 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b)
| ~ s1(b) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( q2(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ l1(X2,X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
l1(b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( s3(X1,X2)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_273]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( s2(X1)
| ~ q2(b,X1,b) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
q2(b,b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( s3(X1,X2)
| ~ q2(X3,X1,X3)
| ~ s2(X1)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X2) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
s2(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(b,a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( s3(b,X1)
| ~ m0(b,X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
m0(b,a,a),
axiom_38 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ s3(b,a),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN299-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:53:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.82/0.58 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.82/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.82/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 8690 completed with status 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.82/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.82/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.82/0.58 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.82/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 8696 completed with status 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.82/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.82/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.82/0.58 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.82/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.82/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.82/0.58
% 0.82/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.82/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.82/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.82/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.82/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Initial clauses : 369
% 0.82/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.82/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 362
% 0.82/0.58 # Processed clauses : 1037
% 0.82/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 93
% 0.82/0.58 # ...subsumed : 28
% 0.82/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 916
% 0.82/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 18
% 0.82/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 115
% 0.82/0.58 # Generated clauses : 1203
% 0.82/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 997
% 0.82/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.82/0.58 # Paramodulations : 1203
% 0.82/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 622
% 0.82/0.58 # ...of those cached : 452
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.82/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 455
% 0.82/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 140
% 0.82/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.82/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 314
% 0.82/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 606
% 0.82/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 1537
% 0.82/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 461
% 0.82/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 54318
% 0.82/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36766
% 0.82/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 45
% 0.82/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1449
% 0.82/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 166
% 0.82/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 85
% 0.82/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.82/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26307
% 0.82/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1461
% 0.82/0.58
% 0.82/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/0.58 # User time : 0.080 s
% 0.82/0.58 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.82/0.58 # Total time : 0.091 s
% 0.82/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2640 pages
% 0.82/0.58
% 0.82/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/0.58 # User time : 0.394 s
% 0.82/0.58 # System time : 0.024 s
% 0.82/0.58 # Total time : 0.418 s
% 0.82/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.82/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------