TSTP Solution File: SYN298-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN298-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wlWUZuQZuZ true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.48s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 1.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN298-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wlWUZuQZuZ true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:20:50 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.72/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.48/0.90 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.48/0.90 % BCE start: 369
% 1.48/0.90 % BCE eliminated: 40
% 1.48/0.90 % PE start: 329
% 1.48/0.90 logic: neq
% 1.48/0.90 % PE eliminated: -6
% 1.48/0.90 % done 337 iterations in 0.148s
% 1.48/0.90 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.48/0.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.48/0.90 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(q0_type, type, q0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(s2_type, type, s2: $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(q2_type, type, q2: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(p1_type, type, p1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(m0_type, type, m0: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(s3_type, type, s3: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(s1_type, type, s1: $i > $o).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(axiom_19, axiom, (m0 @ X @ d @ Y)).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (m0 @ X0 @ d @ X1)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_19])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(rule_181, axiom, (( q2 @ I @ I @ I ) | ( ~( p1 @ I @ I @ I ) ))).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl218, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i]: ( (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_181])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(rule_085, axiom, (( p1 @ B @ B @ B ) | ( ~( p0 @ C @ B ) ))).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl122, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_085])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl905, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl122])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl907, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl218, zip_derived_cl905])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(rule_189, axiom,
% 1.48/0.90 (( s2 @ H ) | ( ~( q2 @ b @ H @ b ) ) | ( ~( s1 @ b ) ))).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl226, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i]: ( (s2 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ b @ X0 @ b) | ~ (s1 @ b))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_189])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(axiom_17, axiom, (q0 @ X @ d)).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (q0 @ X0 @ d)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_17])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(rule_126, axiom, (( s1 @ F ) | ( ~( q0 @ F @ G ) ) | ( ~( s1 @ H ) ))).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl163, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.48/0.90 ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (q0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (s1 @ X2))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_126])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl701, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (s1 @ X1))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl163])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(rule_125, axiom, (( s1 @ I ) | ( ~( p0 @ I @ I ) ))).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_125])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl679, plain, ( (s1 @ b)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl162])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl754, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (s1 @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl701, zip_derived_cl679])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl775, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i]: ( (s2 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ b @ X0 @ b))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl226, zip_derived_cl754])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(rule_273, axiom,
% 1.48/0.90 (( s3 @ I @ J ) | ( ~( q2 @ A @ I @ A ) ) | ( ~( s2 @ I ) ) |
% 1.48/0.90 ( ~( m0 @ A @ B @ J ) ))).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl310, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.48/0.90 ( (s3 @ X0 @ X1)
% 1.48/0.90 | ~ (q2 @ X2 @ X0 @ X2)
% 1.48/0.90 | ~ (s2 @ X0)
% 1.48/0.90 | ~ (m0 @ X2 @ X3 @ X1))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_273])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (s3 @ b @ X)).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( s3 @ b @ X )),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ~ (s3 @ b @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl373, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.48/0.90 (~ (m0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (s2 @ b) | ~ (q2 @ X2 @ b @ X2))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 1.48/0.90 [zip_derived_cl310, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1110, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.48/0.90 (~ (q2 @ b @ b @ b) | ~ (m0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ X2 @ b @ X2))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl775, zip_derived_cl373])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl907, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl218, zip_derived_cl905])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1111, plain,
% 1.48/0.90 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.48/0.90 (~ (m0 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ X2 @ b @ X2))),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1110, zip_derived_cl907])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1113, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (m0 @ b @ X1 @ X0)),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 1.48/0.90 [zip_derived_cl907, zip_derived_cl1111])).
% 1.48/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl1120, plain, ($false),
% 1.48/0.90 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl1113])).
% 1.48/0.90
% 1.48/0.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.48/0.90
% 1.48/0.90
% 1.48/0.90 % Terminating...
% 1.66/0.99 % Runner terminated.
% 1.66/1.00 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------