TSTP Solution File: SYN294-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN294-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',rule_001) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',axiom_37) ).
cnf(rule_034,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',rule_034) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
n0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',axiom_26) ).
cnf(rule_113,axiom,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',rule_113) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p',axiom_13) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
rule_001 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
n0(b,a),
axiom_37 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
rule_034 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
k1(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
n0(d,c),
axiom_26 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( m1(d,X1,X1)
| ~ k1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
k1(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
rule_113 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
m1(d,c,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,c),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
r0(e),
axiom_13 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
~ r0(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SYN294-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:46:06 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RGYsiUqs0r/E---3.1_17393.p
% 0.15/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # new_bool_1 with pid 17472 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.46 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17475 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.46 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.15/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.15/0.46 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.15/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.15/0.46 # Processed clauses : 437
% 0.15/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.15/0.46 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.15/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 398
% 0.15/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 15
% 0.15/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 29
% 0.15/0.46 # Generated clauses : 352
% 0.15/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 223
% 0.15/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.46 # Paramodulations : 350
% 0.15/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 284
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 175
% 0.15/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 84
% 0.15/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 88
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 163
% 0.15/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 361
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 223
% 0.15/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9170
% 0.15/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6926
% 0.15/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.15/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 123
% 0.15/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 0.15/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 25
% 0.15/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10083
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.15/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2304 pages
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.15/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.15/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.15/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------