TSTP Solution File: SYN293-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN293-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.viF9kTLl8Q true
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.40s 0.88s
% Output : Refutation 1.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN293-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.viF9kTLl8Q true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:42:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.80/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.80/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.80/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.80/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.35/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.40/0.88 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.40/0.88 % BCE start: 369
% 1.40/0.88 % BCE eliminated: 40
% 1.40/0.88 % PE start: 329
% 1.40/0.88 logic: neq
% 1.40/0.88 % PE eliminated: -6
% 1.40/0.88 % done 391 iterations in 0.162s
% 1.40/0.88 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.40/0.88 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.40/0.88 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(q0_type, type, q0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $o).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(q1_type, type, q1: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (q1 @ d @ d @ a)).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( q1 @ d @ d @ a )),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (q1 @ d @ d @ a)),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(axiom_17, axiom, (q0 @ X @ d)).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (q0 @ X0 @ d)),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_17])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(rule_109, axiom,
% 1.40/0.88 (( q1 @ E @ E @ F ) | ( ~( p0 @ G @ G ) ) | ( ~( q0 @ F @ E ) ) |
% 1.40/0.88 ( ~( k1 @ E ) ))).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl146, plain,
% 1.40/0.88 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.40/0.88 ( (q1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1)
% 1.40/0.88 | ~ (p0 @ X2 @ X2)
% 1.40/0.88 | ~ (q0 @ X1 @ X0)
% 1.40/0.88 | ~ (k1 @ X0))),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_109])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl1222, plain,
% 1.40/0.88 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.40/0.88 ( (q1 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (q0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (k1 @ X1))),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl146])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl1244, plain,
% 1.40/0.88 (![X0 : $i]: ( (q1 @ d @ d @ X0) | ~ (k1 @ d))),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl1222])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(axiom_34, axiom, (n0 @ c @ d)).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (n0 @ c @ d)),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_34])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(rule_001, axiom, (( k1 @ I ) | ( ~( n0 @ J @ I ) ))).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 1.40/0.88 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (k1 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl709, plain, ( (k1 @ d)),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl1250, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (q1 @ d @ d @ X0)),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1244, zip_derived_cl709])).
% 1.40/0.88 thf(zip_derived_cl1268, plain, ($false),
% 1.40/0.88 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl368, zip_derived_cl1250])).
% 1.40/0.88
% 1.40/0.88 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.40/0.88
% 1.40/0.88
% 1.40/0.88 % Terminating...
% 1.80/0.94 % Runner terminated.
% 1.80/0.95 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------