TSTP Solution File: SYN293-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN293-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:29:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',rule_001) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',axiom_37) ).
cnf(rule_034,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',rule_034) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(rule_113,axiom,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',rule_113) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p',axiom_13) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
rule_001 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
n0(b,a),
axiom_37 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
rule_034 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
k1(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( m1(d,X1,X1)
| ~ k1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
rule_113 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
m1(d,a,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,a),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
r0(e),
axiom_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ r0(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN293-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:03:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Q2H6WZgRwe/E---3.1_9306.p
% 0.19/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # new_bool_3 with pid 9391 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.53 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.53 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 9394 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.53 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.53 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.19/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.19/0.53 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.19/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.19/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.19/0.53 # Processed clauses : 459
% 0.19/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 29
% 0.19/0.53 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.19/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 415
% 0.19/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 18
% 0.19/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 41
% 0.19/0.53 # Generated clauses : 414
% 0.19/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 275
% 0.19/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.54 # Paramodulations : 412
% 0.19/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 329
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 177
% 0.19/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 83
% 0.19/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 92
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 191
% 0.19/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 405
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 238
% 0.19/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10229
% 0.19/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7679
% 0.19/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 0.19/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 150
% 0.19/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 112
% 0.19/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 0.19/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10815
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.19/0.54 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2296 pages
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.19/0.54 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.19/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1996 pages
% 0.19/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------